Quote
Ramboni
Any opinion could be considered biased by anyone that disagrees with it. Former players are typically far more candid than current ones since the latter could face serious consequences including losing their job. Especially if talking about the QB (see Antonio Brown). Typically if someone is lying, it is for a reason and some sort of gain from it. I see none here, what is past has passed.
And it's not just former players. It's scouts, coaches, front office people.
Here's what happens when a quoted source comes forth and makes a claim that other insiders dispute or reject. The others say so. They don't just shrug at a published account which, to them, is either inaccurate or fabricated.
People come out and say things, both on and off the record.
So here you have a team that has a long list of personnel people, front office people, coaches, and players--both present and former players---and they hear that the qb has issues. They don't buy that story and in fact think it's inaccurate. But to a man, not one of them says anything? (?) When in fact it's ridiculously easy TO say something?
All that sound real likely to anybody?
Refusal to believe something is not an argument. For example refusal to believe the earth is round is not an argument, it's just a belief.
And so without evidence when we try to smear sources---ie they're lying, they don't know--and doing so without any evidence whatsoever is not an argument. It's just refusal to believe something. Well people can believe or not believe what they want, but when they try to convince others, they should have an argument based on evidence--not an effort to discredit the (imagined) motives of the sources.
...
....
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 04/06/2019 09:50AM by zn.
