April 01, 2019 02:23AM
I think taking a chance on a guy like Isabella in the 4th or 5th round is okay even though you should not expect him to a full time receiver. I am all in on Deadpool's positional bias of 6 feet for a WR but Isabella isn't anywhere close and his catch radius is Austin like. Austin was one of those terrible mistakes by Fisher/Snead. A small WR who wasn't a good route runner, had small hands, small catch radius but was fast as they come. Maybe the Robinson pick was worst but Austin is a close 2nd.

Anyway taking a gadget guy in round 4 and putting a package of plays for him where he can make an impact right away provided he can win a returner job on special teams makes a lot of sense. The guy would be active since he won the returners job and you get to use him as a surprise weapon with a limited package designed to get him the ball in space. I am not saying Isabella is that guy but a returner who can come in an contribute on offense would be nice. Currently Jo Jo Natson takes up a roster spot with no ability to play offense.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  A draft thought: Rams go for offensive weapons

RockRam565March 30, 2019 10:40AM

  Re: A draft thought: Rams go for offensive weapons

cool_hand_luke231March 30, 2019 11:13AM

  The only names I can come up with

Deadpool214March 31, 2019 05:40PM

  Re: The only names I can come up with

dzrams193March 31, 2019 05:59PM

  I don't like him as much as some

Deadpool264March 31, 2019 07:18PM

  Re: I don't like him as much as some

dzrams137March 31, 2019 07:34PM

  I don't want to talk you out of liking a guy

Deadpool140March 31, 2019 08:17PM

  Re: I don't want to talk you out of liking a guy

David Deacon109April 01, 2019 02:23AM

  Re: There's a world of differences between the two...

dzrams139April 01, 2019 05:23AM

  Re: There's a world of differences between the two...

David Deacon99April 01, 2019 09:18AM

  Ahh

waterfield155March 31, 2019 06:04PM

  Re: Ahh

bigjimram21128March 31, 2019 08:06PM

  The idea that we can stand pat on our attack is for me...

jemach136April 01, 2019 03:53AM

  Re: The idea that we can stand pat on our attack is for me...

zn177April 01, 2019 05:25AM

  Why would getting an weapon in round 1 constitute...

jemach191April 01, 2019 07:39AM

  Re: Why would getting an weapon in round 1 constitute...

Rams43106April 01, 2019 08:15AM

  because.

zn124April 01, 2019 10:22AM

  Agree with everything with 1 addition.....

roman18211April 01, 2019 10:37AM

  +1 (NM)

zn88April 01, 2019 11:08AM

  yup....

SunTzu_vs_Camus232April 01, 2019 04:00PM

  If our defense hinges on the #1 pick...

jemach242April 01, 2019 11:50AM

  Re: If our defense hinges on the #1 pick...

dzrams120April 01, 2019 11:58AM

  I think we are in a good position...

jemach116April 02, 2019 07:17AM

  no one said it "HINGES" on it

zn147April 01, 2019 12:09PM

  I don't think our defense is weaker.

RockRam116April 01, 2019 12:20PM

  Re: I don't think our defense is weaker.

zn133April 01, 2019 12:33PM

  COMPLETELY agree here, zn....

SunTzu_vs_Camus162April 01, 2019 03:59PM

  plus I forgot

zn339April 01, 2019 09:44PM