Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: There's a world of differences between the two...

April 01, 2019 09:18AM
Quote
dzrams
Quote
David Deacon
I think taking a chance on a guy like Isabella in the 4th or 5th round is okay even though you should not expect him to a full time receiver. I am all in on Deadpool's positional bias of 6 feet for a WR but Isabella isn't anywhere close and his catch radius is Austin like. Austin was one of those terrible mistakes by Fisher/Snead. A small WR who wasn't a good route runner, had small hands, small catch radius but was fast as they come. Maybe the Robinson pick was worst but Austin is a close 2nd.

Anyway taking a gadget guy in round 4 and putting a package of plays for him where he can make an impact right away provided he can win a returner job on special teams makes a lot of sense. The guy would be active since he won the returners job and you get to use him as a surprise weapon with a limited package designed to get him the ball in space. I am not saying Isabella is that guy but a returner who can come in an contribute on offense would be nice. Currently Jo Jo Natson takes up a roster spot with no ability to play offense.

There's no comparison between Isabella and Austin beyond the height / stature differences. Yeah they both share the height, small hands, and small catch radius. Other than that, nothing.

Austin wasn't a WR in college. He never learned how to run routes or even catch the ball. He never learned how to create separation, etc. TA was really a RB and that was his best position in college.

Isabella, on the other hand, is very good at those things. He has elite burst and acceleration and he uses that to create space even against bigger, physical corners. And while Deadpool doesn't like his jittery moves at the line, he's used those very well to create separation. He will need to learn how to simplify his releases some of the time but that can easily be cleaned up.

But the biggest reason I like him is because he dominated at the Senior Bowl. That's why I think he could be on Snead's radar. He couldn't be covered. As Deadpool stated, his competition wasn't the highest at the FBSS level but that's why what he did at the Senior Bowl is so important. Look it up. The only player who could stay remotely close to him was Darnell Savage.

Further, you don't automatically become a gadget guy because you're under 6 feet. I get the bias but we gotta do better analysis than that. IMO, you'd be getting a guy in Isabella who could eventually replace Cooks or Kupp. He's got high football intelligence and just knows how to get open; he knows how to consistently find the open spaces in coverage....kind of like Kupp.

I hear you DZ on the WR route running skill set and did not mean to make that comparison to Austin. As stated I actually think taking a guy that can be a gadget guy and returner would be good use of a draft choice. With our WR corp a new WR is not going to see the field. The best WR in the draft would be fighting Reynolds for the number 4 WR position. Having someone with a unique skill set of speed and elusiveness could get on the field with certain packages designed to exploit their skill set for explosive plays and he would be active if he wins a returners position.

I don't however like little WR drafted high but picked in the right spot I would love to have one on the team. We traded up for Austin despite all the red flags surrounding his hand size, catch radius and route running. WR also is not an area of need so I can't see them using more than a 4th round pick for that position.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  A draft thought: Rams go for offensive weapons

RockRam562March 30, 2019 10:40AM

  Re: A draft thought: Rams go for offensive weapons

cool_hand_luke230March 30, 2019 11:13AM

  The only names I can come up with

Deadpool213March 31, 2019 05:40PM

  Re: The only names I can come up with

dzrams192March 31, 2019 05:59PM

  I don't like him as much as some

Deadpool263March 31, 2019 07:18PM

  Re: I don't like him as much as some

dzrams136March 31, 2019 07:34PM

  I don't want to talk you out of liking a guy

Deadpool139March 31, 2019 08:17PM

  Re: I don't want to talk you out of liking a guy

David Deacon108April 01, 2019 02:23AM

  Re: There's a world of differences between the two...

dzrams138April 01, 2019 05:23AM

  Re: There's a world of differences between the two...

David Deacon97April 01, 2019 09:18AM

  Ahh

waterfield154March 31, 2019 06:04PM

  Re: Ahh

bigjimram21127March 31, 2019 08:06PM

  The idea that we can stand pat on our attack is for me...

jemach135April 01, 2019 03:53AM

  Re: The idea that we can stand pat on our attack is for me...

zn176April 01, 2019 05:25AM

  Why would getting an weapon in round 1 constitute...

jemach189April 01, 2019 07:39AM

  Re: Why would getting an weapon in round 1 constitute...

Rams43105April 01, 2019 08:15AM

  because.

zn123April 01, 2019 10:22AM

  Agree with everything with 1 addition.....

roman18210April 01, 2019 10:37AM

  +1 (NM)

zn87April 01, 2019 11:08AM

  yup....

SunTzu_vs_Camus231April 01, 2019 04:00PM

  If our defense hinges on the #1 pick...

jemach240April 01, 2019 11:50AM

  Re: If our defense hinges on the #1 pick...

dzrams118April 01, 2019 11:58AM

  I think we are in a good position...

jemach115April 02, 2019 07:17AM

  no one said it "HINGES" on it

zn145April 01, 2019 12:09PM

  I don't think our defense is weaker.

RockRam115April 01, 2019 12:20PM

  Re: I don't think our defense is weaker.

zn132April 01, 2019 12:33PM

  COMPLETELY agree here, zn....

SunTzu_vs_Camus158April 01, 2019 03:59PM

  plus I forgot

zn338April 01, 2019 09:44PM