not sure who you are referring to but if you mean me...ive said a few times now that goff was bad. in fact goff himself said he was bad. im not defending his play in the superbowl. however focusing only on highlights or in this case lowlights is problematic for obvious reasons. so what gets tiresome for me is for the same posters to post their same criticism time and again and only after a poor performances. this to me is entirely disingenuous and imo the poster is probably trolling the board. if you what to have a legit discussion on goff, thats fine. but take the whole body of work into account. .

Quote
dzrams

Quote
den-the-coach
Was bad in his first couple of starts with Cal, became a first overall pick. Was bad in his first several starts with the Los Angeles Rams became an all pro...Was bad in his first Super Bowl start?????

First I gotta say, man people are so defensive about Goff. It's like people can't say that Goff played badly. And when people point that out it means the poster doesn't like Goff.

It's ridiculous! Goff didn't play well. Period!

That said, his ability to exponentially grow after being horrible the first time he faces something is remarkable. It's one of his strongest intangibles.

I'm still very optimistic on Goff. Awful game though....