Quote
zn

Quote
max

Quote
zn
Foles was bad, Keenum was good under the same conditions. If you are going to make it all about coaching then both would be bad. It wasn't all about coaching. Not only was Foles bad, he was unusually and particularly bad. Worse than Davis was in 2014 when he melted down and worse than Goff was in 2016 when he started as an especially green rookie.

Nowhere in my posts did I ever say it was all about the coaching, so I'm not sure why you're implying I did with "If you are going to make it all about coaching then both would be bad. It wasn't all about coaching."

Let's agree on 2 things.
1. It wasn't all about the coaching.
2. Foles was extremely bad.

However, coaching WAS A PART OF IT. That's what I'm saying and have been saying.

Foles got better coaching AND a better OL in Philly. Therein lies the reason for his turnaround.

I don't agree that coaching was a part of Foles being bad.

I think a lot of the times some discussions of coaching are just dedicated to ignoring other factors that impact a team and its record,

...