Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: it's a silly argument

July 10, 2017 10:34AM
Quote
RFIP
You're gonna ding a guy for not many 4th q sacks PLAYING ON A TEAM THAT NEVER HAS A LEAD?

More importantly, just watch the tape, it don't lie. Leave him singled and your play is doomed.

I said it was nonsense, especially since his 3rd down sacks are above what would be expected. So stats don't even support the premise. Can't get worse than that.

However, in the new scheme, we may see him doubled more often. I don;t know that, we have to wait anf see, but scheme wise you can bump him with a guard who then goes to the ILBer and then block Donald with a center or tackle, who would be the primary blocker. Also, someone has to step up and rush the passer, Barwin, Quinn, etc so that Donald won't be doubled too much. In 2015 he was Doubled about 40% if that goes to 50, it cuts down on production and we have to hope those getting singled step it up...that's my concern. Not some bogus statistical analysis or some self-proclaimed "I am always right" type.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 07/10/2017 10:35AM by Blue and Gold.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Aaron Donald's impact...

laram796July 10, 2017 08:37AM

  Don't you need to know

RamUK271July 10, 2017 08:43AM

  Re: You are correct UK, BUT...

laram258July 10, 2017 09:02AM

  Sacks are exciting, but not a great indicator of player impact.

rambleon231July 10, 2017 08:46AM

  he's not a big game player....

LMU93272July 10, 2017 09:09AM

  Re: Aaron Donald's impact...

Blue and Gold255July 10, 2017 09:17AM

  Re: Aaron Donald's impact... Attachments

Blue and Gold311July 10, 2017 09:46AM

  Re:No...

laram332July 10, 2017 10:49AM

  Re: Re:No...

Blue and Gold192July 10, 2017 11:16AM

  Re: Aaron Donald's impact...

dzrams273July 10, 2017 09:50AM

  Most likely wrong here, but I'm reading laram this way...

JamesJM239July 10, 2017 09:55AM

  Re: Most likely wrong here, but I'm reading laram this way...

Blue and Gold278July 10, 2017 10:06AM

  it's a silly argument

RFIP236July 10, 2017 10:22AM

  Re: Lol, how many times have I heard that...

laram238July 10, 2017 10:34AM

  Re: it's a silly argument

Blue and Gold220July 10, 2017 10:34AM

  Re: it's a silly argument

RFIP231July 10, 2017 10:49AM

  Re: Probably who Davis named above Donald...

laram330July 10, 2017 10:53AM

  Re: it's a silly argument

Blue and Gold274July 10, 2017 11:26AM

  Re: No you are correct James...

laram309July 10, 2017 10:24AM

  Re: Most likely wrong here, but I'm reading laram this way...

zn262July 10, 2017 10:55AM

  I know...

JamesJM339July 10, 2017 11:26AM

  Re: I know...

zn223July 10, 2017 11:30AM

  And Farr

TonyHunter87195July 10, 2017 11:36AM

  Larry Brooks...

Blue and Gold267July 10, 2017 11:55AM

  Re: Larry Brooks...

zn245July 10, 2017 11:56AM

  I guess that settles it.

Blue and Gold222July 10, 2017 12:09PM

  Re: I guess that settles it.

zn249July 10, 2017 12:31PM

  He just don't make enough big plays

TonyHunter87291July 10, 2017 11:42AM

  Just outta curiosity...

JamesJM189July 10, 2017 11:51AM

  Three words....

Rampage2K-232July 10, 2017 12:48PM

  And I'll raise you 3 more words...

RFIP223July 10, 2017 12:53PM

  Re: And I'll raise you 3 more words...

Rams43225July 10, 2017 12:56PM

  Re: And I'll raise you 3 more words...

Rampage2K-204July 10, 2017 01:05PM

  Re: And I'll raise you 3 more words...

RFIP226July 10, 2017 01:08PM

  Re: And I'll raise you 3 more words...

Rams43307July 10, 2017 01:14PM

  Re: And I'll raise you 3 more words...

Rampage2K-217July 10, 2017 01:20PM

  Re: By whom, your pals at Sirius? lol...NM

laram254July 10, 2017 01:53PM

  I don't agree . . .Yet

Blue and Gold340July 10, 2017 01:57PM