Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Sacks are exciting, but not a great indicator of player impact.

July 10, 2017 08:46AM
They happen relatively rarely (especially for DT's). What is the impact of your DL on every play where they're not getting a sack?

Check out this article for more insight: [www.profootballfocus.com]

"Aaron Donald led all interior defenders with 82 total pressures this season, a mark that tied for third overall in the NFL. He may have recorded “only” eight sacks, but nobody was better at generating consistent, impactful pressure than Donald, especially when you consider the position he was playing."

"Of course, not all pressure is created equal, and raw numbers can sometimes mislead. Pressure can take the form of a sack after a defender beats a double-team in under two seconds, a clean-up pressure where the QB is forced to move into a pass-rusher’s leverage, or from a defender having an unblocked path straight to the QB.

Where Donald really separates himself from the pack is in how his pressure comes about. He generated decisive pressure (graded at +1.0 or better in PFF’s incremental, play-by-play grading scale) once every 8.7 rushes. That figure would be the third-best rate of pressure among interior defenders, and it’s only counting Donald’s most impactful pressures."
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Aaron Donald's impact...

laram790July 10, 2017 08:37AM

  Don't you need to know

RamUK270July 10, 2017 08:43AM

  Re: You are correct UK, BUT...

laram258July 10, 2017 09:02AM

  Sacks are exciting, but not a great indicator of player impact.

rambleon230July 10, 2017 08:46AM

  he's not a big game player....

LMU93268July 10, 2017 09:09AM

  Re: Aaron Donald's impact...

Blue and Gold255July 10, 2017 09:17AM

  Re: Aaron Donald's impact... Attachments

Blue and Gold306July 10, 2017 09:46AM

  Re:No...

laram329July 10, 2017 10:49AM

  Re: Re:No...

Blue and Gold191July 10, 2017 11:16AM

  Re: Aaron Donald's impact...

dzrams272July 10, 2017 09:50AM

  Most likely wrong here, but I'm reading laram this way...

JamesJM237July 10, 2017 09:55AM

  Re: Most likely wrong here, but I'm reading laram this way...

Blue and Gold277July 10, 2017 10:06AM

  it's a silly argument

RFIP235July 10, 2017 10:22AM

  Re: Lol, how many times have I heard that...

laram238July 10, 2017 10:34AM

  Re: it's a silly argument

Blue and Gold220July 10, 2017 10:34AM

  Re: it's a silly argument

RFIP229July 10, 2017 10:49AM

  Re: Probably who Davis named above Donald...

laram330July 10, 2017 10:53AM

  Re: it's a silly argument

Blue and Gold271July 10, 2017 11:26AM

  Re: No you are correct James...

laram309July 10, 2017 10:24AM

  Re: Most likely wrong here, but I'm reading laram this way...

zn262July 10, 2017 10:55AM

  I know...

JamesJM339July 10, 2017 11:26AM

  Re: I know...

zn222July 10, 2017 11:30AM

  And Farr

TonyHunter87194July 10, 2017 11:36AM

  Larry Brooks...

Blue and Gold266July 10, 2017 11:55AM

  Re: Larry Brooks...

zn244July 10, 2017 11:56AM

  I guess that settles it.

Blue and Gold221July 10, 2017 12:09PM

  Re: I guess that settles it.

zn249July 10, 2017 12:31PM

  He just don't make enough big plays

TonyHunter87290July 10, 2017 11:42AM

  Just outta curiosity...

JamesJM189July 10, 2017 11:51AM

  Three words....

Rampage2K-231July 10, 2017 12:48PM

  And I'll raise you 3 more words...

RFIP223July 10, 2017 12:53PM

  Re: And I'll raise you 3 more words...

Rams43224July 10, 2017 12:56PM

  Re: And I'll raise you 3 more words...

Rampage2K-203July 10, 2017 01:05PM

  Re: And I'll raise you 3 more words...

RFIP225July 10, 2017 01:08PM

  Re: And I'll raise you 3 more words...

Rams43307July 10, 2017 01:14PM

  Re: And I'll raise you 3 more words...

Rampage2K-217July 10, 2017 01:20PM

  Re: By whom, your pals at Sirius? lol...NM

laram253July 10, 2017 01:53PM

  I don't agree . . .Yet

Blue and Gold340July 10, 2017 01:57PM