Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: You are correct UK, BUT...

July 10, 2017 09:02AM
Quote
RamUK
How many of those 1st and 2nd down sacks the opposition then went on to make a new to stick with Davis's logic? If they were helping turn the ball over then they're exponentially more useful than if they just slowed the offense down a tad.

Also, how can you determine other effects his sacks and disruption have on the opposition such as knocking their timing off or causing them to change their game plan etc?

.

But based on point differentials and the defenses standing in related categories, its a safe assumption that they weren't that impactful.

Plus as Davis mentioned your job as a defensive player is to turn the ball over and Donald doesn't do that.

4 ff's and ONE fumble recovery in 48 games!!

No bueno No Way smiley



Best,
Laram
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Aaron Donald's impact...

laram790July 10, 2017 08:37AM

  Don't you need to know

RamUK270July 10, 2017 08:43AM

  Re: You are correct UK, BUT...

laram257July 10, 2017 09:02AM

  Sacks are exciting, but not a great indicator of player impact.

rambleon230July 10, 2017 08:46AM

  he's not a big game player....

LMU93268July 10, 2017 09:09AM

  Re: Aaron Donald's impact...

Blue and Gold254July 10, 2017 09:17AM

  Re: Aaron Donald's impact... Attachments

Blue and Gold305July 10, 2017 09:46AM

  Re:No...

laram329July 10, 2017 10:49AM

  Re: Re:No...

Blue and Gold191July 10, 2017 11:16AM

  Re: Aaron Donald's impact...

dzrams272July 10, 2017 09:50AM

  Most likely wrong here, but I'm reading laram this way...

JamesJM237July 10, 2017 09:55AM

  Re: Most likely wrong here, but I'm reading laram this way...

Blue and Gold277July 10, 2017 10:06AM

  it's a silly argument

RFIP235July 10, 2017 10:22AM

  Re: Lol, how many times have I heard that...

laram237July 10, 2017 10:34AM

  Re: it's a silly argument

Blue and Gold220July 10, 2017 10:34AM

  Re: it's a silly argument

RFIP229July 10, 2017 10:49AM

  Re: Probably who Davis named above Donald...

laram330July 10, 2017 10:53AM

  Re: it's a silly argument

Blue and Gold271July 10, 2017 11:26AM

  Re: No you are correct James...

laram309July 10, 2017 10:24AM

  Re: Most likely wrong here, but I'm reading laram this way...

zn261July 10, 2017 10:55AM

  I know...

JamesJM338July 10, 2017 11:26AM

  Re: I know...

zn222July 10, 2017 11:30AM

  And Farr

TonyHunter87194July 10, 2017 11:36AM

  Larry Brooks...

Blue and Gold266July 10, 2017 11:55AM

  Re: Larry Brooks...

zn244July 10, 2017 11:56AM

  I guess that settles it.

Blue and Gold220July 10, 2017 12:09PM

  Re: I guess that settles it.

zn248July 10, 2017 12:31PM

  He just don't make enough big plays

TonyHunter87290July 10, 2017 11:42AM

  Just outta curiosity...

JamesJM188July 10, 2017 11:51AM

  Three words....

Rampage2K-231July 10, 2017 12:48PM

  And I'll raise you 3 more words...

RFIP222July 10, 2017 12:53PM

  Re: And I'll raise you 3 more words...

Rams43224July 10, 2017 12:56PM

  Re: And I'll raise you 3 more words...

Rampage2K-203July 10, 2017 01:05PM

  Re: And I'll raise you 3 more words...

RFIP225July 10, 2017 01:08PM

  Re: And I'll raise you 3 more words...

Rams43306July 10, 2017 01:14PM

  Re: And I'll raise you 3 more words...

Rampage2K-216July 10, 2017 01:20PM

  Re: By whom, your pals at Sirius? lol...NM

laram252July 10, 2017 01:53PM

  I don't agree . . .Yet

Blue and Gold340July 10, 2017 01:57PM