Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: many posters here used the worst roster NFL history

December 11, 2016 03:28AM
Quote
ferragamo79
argument......I know your back recently, but that was a common argument for years

Well THAT was a bad argument that was simply blind to the fact that the 2011 Rams had (according to Football Outsiders) the single most injured offense since 2002. And that's not even counting the 10 CBs they lost in one year.

A lot of times, people just don't factor things like that in. It leads to incomplete and usually not very useful analysis.

Fisher inherited far more in 2012 than Carroll did in Seattle in 2010.

Oh and btw fwiw I don't really personally count it as meaning much that "people used to argue" something. It usually makes no difference to me. BUT if some people used to argue the 2012 Rams roster was "depleted" fine...I just think that's obviously wrong. In fact 5 years later they still have 6 regular contributors from before 2012, and that's after letting JL and Long go.

2012 needed to be rebuilt but they DID inherit players.

...

.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 12/11/2016 03:36AM by zn.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  A very thought provoking post by Aeneas1...

Rams431128December 10, 2016 06:29AM

  a very red herring argument.

zn548December 10, 2016 06:33AM

  many posters here used the worst roster NFL history

ferragamo79376December 10, 2016 07:51AM

  Along with the youngest team in the NFL...

jemach366December 10, 2016 01:05PM

  Re: many posters here used the worst roster NFL history

zn323December 11, 2016 03:28AM

  Re: a very red herring argument.

Rams43325December 10, 2016 08:00AM

  Re: a very red herring argument.

guinnessram289December 10, 2016 09:48AM

  Re: a very red herring argument.

zn230December 11, 2016 03:17AM

  Re: a very red herring argument.

Rams43185December 11, 2016 09:54AM

  Re: a very red herring argument.

max185December 11, 2016 10:11AM

  Those teams have QBs

Zooey318December 10, 2016 06:46AM

  Those teams have QBs: Regardless of who the HC is?

Anonymous User405December 10, 2016 07:35AM

  Okay

Zooey399December 10, 2016 07:47AM

  The development of Goff.....

HighPlainsDrifter451December 10, 2016 08:00AM

  Re: The development of Goff.....

zn278December 10, 2016 03:51PM

  Re: The development of Goff.....

Zooey325December 10, 2016 05:19PM

  Re: Okay

21Dog197December 11, 2016 04:06AM

  IMO much of the time that's true

LesBaker321December 10, 2016 07:50AM

  Re: IMO much of the time that's true

Anonymous User316December 10, 2016 08:09AM

  He had Bradford.

no name250December 10, 2016 01:18PM

  Re: He had Bradford.

zn198December 11, 2016 02:51AM

  Not sure it's all going to be on Goff

NewMexicoRam559December 10, 2016 05:18PM

  stuff

zn192December 11, 2016 03:09AM

  But will Goff be able to get the kind of experience he needs?

NewMexicoRam411December 11, 2016 03:37AM

  sure

zn307December 11, 2016 03:39AM

  I post every year this same argument

ferragamo79309December 10, 2016 07:53AM

  Re: I post every year this same argument

poplarbluffman310December 10, 2016 10:07AM

  Wrong!

BobCarl246December 10, 2016 07:57AM