Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Those teams have QBs

December 10, 2016 06:46AM
Their QBs are all better than Davis/Foles/Keenum.

I disagree with zn on the depleted roster. It was pretty bad when Fisher came over. A lot of those guys were out of the league when they left the Rams, and the Rams roster has improved to the point that a lot of their ex-players, and even PS players, are picked up by other teams. The talent is better.

In any event, I think after 5 years, yeah, 4-8 is not okay.

But I will say that I think the QB play has been more responsible than the head coaching.

If Goff ascends, the Rams ascend. Regardless of who the Head Coach is.

If Goff busts, none of the coaches being talked about as Fisher's replacement are going to make any difference.

It is all about Goff at this point. imho.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  A very thought provoking post by Aeneas1...

Rams431128December 10, 2016 06:29AM

  a very red herring argument.

zn548December 10, 2016 06:33AM

  many posters here used the worst roster NFL history

ferragamo79376December 10, 2016 07:51AM

  Along with the youngest team in the NFL...

jemach366December 10, 2016 01:05PM

  Re: many posters here used the worst roster NFL history

zn324December 11, 2016 03:28AM

  Re: a very red herring argument.

Rams43325December 10, 2016 08:00AM

  Re: a very red herring argument.

guinnessram289December 10, 2016 09:48AM

  Re: a very red herring argument.

zn230December 11, 2016 03:17AM

  Re: a very red herring argument.

Rams43186December 11, 2016 09:54AM

  Re: a very red herring argument.

max185December 11, 2016 10:11AM

  Those teams have QBs

Zooey318December 10, 2016 06:46AM

  Those teams have QBs: Regardless of who the HC is?

Anonymous User405December 10, 2016 07:35AM

  Okay

Zooey400December 10, 2016 07:47AM

  The development of Goff.....

HighPlainsDrifter451December 10, 2016 08:00AM

  Re: The development of Goff.....

zn278December 10, 2016 03:51PM

  Re: The development of Goff.....

Zooey325December 10, 2016 05:19PM

  Re: Okay

21Dog197December 11, 2016 04:06AM

  IMO much of the time that's true

LesBaker321December 10, 2016 07:50AM

  Re: IMO much of the time that's true

Anonymous User316December 10, 2016 08:09AM

  He had Bradford.

no name250December 10, 2016 01:18PM

  Re: He had Bradford.

zn199December 11, 2016 02:51AM

  Not sure it's all going to be on Goff

NewMexicoRam559December 10, 2016 05:18PM

  stuff

zn193December 11, 2016 03:09AM

  But will Goff be able to get the kind of experience he needs?

NewMexicoRam411December 11, 2016 03:37AM

  sure

zn308December 11, 2016 03:39AM

  I post every year this same argument

ferragamo79309December 10, 2016 07:53AM

  Re: I post every year this same argument

poplarbluffman310December 10, 2016 10:07AM

  Wrong!

BobCarl247December 10, 2016 07:57AM