Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Those teams have QBs: Regardless of who the HC is?

Anonymous User
December 10, 2016 07:35AM
Quote
Zooey
Their QBs are all better than Davis/Foles/Keenum.


If Goff ascends, the Rams ascend. Regardless of who the Head Coach is.

If Goff busts, none of the coaches being talked about as Fisher's replacement are going to make any difference.

It is all about Goff at this point. imho.

IF Goff ascends the Rams ascend Regardless of who the head coach is? That is a narrow limb to walk out on.

If the wrong head coach with his hand selected offensive staff develop Goff, he will ascend at a snails pace..

Better talent/coaching on the O-Line and pass catchers are also needed to for him to ascend. The Lack of professional quality coaching (correct fit for his skill set) and a failed offensive scheme have a big impact on his career early on.

An NFL head coach and his selected staff do matter, Regardless of how talented the QB from Cal is, he comes from a college system that requires competent coaching to accelerate his talent to the point of ascending a team to the level you're referring to.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  A very thought provoking post by Aeneas1...

Rams431128December 10, 2016 06:29AM

  a very red herring argument.

zn547December 10, 2016 06:33AM

  many posters here used the worst roster NFL history

ferragamo79375December 10, 2016 07:51AM

  Along with the youngest team in the NFL...

jemach366December 10, 2016 01:05PM

  Re: many posters here used the worst roster NFL history

zn323December 11, 2016 03:28AM

  Re: a very red herring argument.

Rams43325December 10, 2016 08:00AM

  Re: a very red herring argument.

guinnessram288December 10, 2016 09:48AM

  Re: a very red herring argument.

zn230December 11, 2016 03:17AM

  Re: a very red herring argument.

Rams43185December 11, 2016 09:54AM

  Re: a very red herring argument.

max184December 11, 2016 10:11AM

  Those teams have QBs

Zooey318December 10, 2016 06:46AM

  Those teams have QBs: Regardless of who the HC is?

Anonymous User404December 10, 2016 07:35AM

  Okay

Zooey399December 10, 2016 07:47AM

  The development of Goff.....

HighPlainsDrifter450December 10, 2016 08:00AM

  Re: The development of Goff.....

zn277December 10, 2016 03:51PM

  Re: The development of Goff.....

Zooey325December 10, 2016 05:19PM

  Re: Okay

21Dog197December 11, 2016 04:06AM

  IMO much of the time that's true

LesBaker321December 10, 2016 07:50AM

  Re: IMO much of the time that's true

Anonymous User315December 10, 2016 08:09AM

  He had Bradford.

no name249December 10, 2016 01:18PM

  Re: He had Bradford.

zn198December 11, 2016 02:51AM

  Not sure it's all going to be on Goff

NewMexicoRam559December 10, 2016 05:18PM

  stuff

zn192December 11, 2016 03:09AM

  But will Goff be able to get the kind of experience he needs?

NewMexicoRam411December 11, 2016 03:37AM

  sure

zn307December 11, 2016 03:39AM

  I post every year this same argument

ferragamo79309December 10, 2016 07:53AM

  Re: I post every year this same argument

poplarbluffman309December 10, 2016 10:07AM

  Wrong!

BobCarl246December 10, 2016 07:57AM