To say that on any given play there are choices (reads), complex choices - choices that we as fans don't fully understand is a given... to say that because that's so we as fans can't see what is happening is a false premise. If Keenum drops back I can SEE if he is going through progressions and it matters not one bit if I understand what the 'playbook' might offer OR what was going thru Keenum's head before and after the snap... it doesn't change anything.
"Stupidity" doesn't enter into this.. that's no more than hyperbole meant to demean another's opinion.
Another false premise... "The more likely scenario".. no it's not. The most likely scenario is what is actually happening. Keenum, in the Hawk's game at least, was NOT spotting open receivers... to say that because the playbook is complex and unknown to us, that it's sophisticated, that Goff doesn't understand it well yet, we can't 'know' that Keenum didn't spot an open receiver makes no sense.
Just one more thing... I see you, and others saying time and time again that Goff has 'never' changed protection.. how do you guys 'know' that?