Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: I would add

September 29, 2016 04:39AM
Quote
Speed_Kills
There is simply not a ton of reading going on with Keenum. I only say this after actually watching him through three games. Keenum is not seeing a ton right now. He generally goes to 1 read. While it's true he might read the defense at the Los scrimmage and change plays...while the play is in motion Keenum rarely takes time to actually read how the play is unfolding

This was true in Tampa as well and as you say could be seen in the Hawks game. If any of you get the all-22 I suggest you watch it. I think a lot if that is a function of Keenum being very careful with the ball and not a ton of confidence in his arm.

The Rams leave a ton of plays on the field between the drops and Keenum's marginal play. I used to think that as long as Keenum played ok maybe the Rams could be more than a 7 win team. However, as his sample size has gotten larger I am less convinced of that.

I wish I could take Keenum's knowledge of the playbook and insert it into Goff's brain. Keenum's ceiling appears to be 190-250 yards and 2 TDs a game. The Rams will need more than that here shortly.

Getting the ball out quickly is often simply a case of going with the read you liked from the pre-snap look.

And in spite of your criticism Keenum has been playing okay. They are 5-3 with him starting.

None of this is different from last year. I mean they can win with a #2 caliber qb playing efficiently. Then what I hear from some critics is "hey, he's just a #2 caliber qb!" Well we knew that.

It's not just knowledge of the playbook. Goff has never done things like alter a protection before the snap to counter a blitz he sees. Along with everything else he has to think about on a play.

This may be the only team where the qb isn't losing games for them, they are doing well enough to start strong for the season, and fans complain. Heck I say if they had THIS level of qb play all year last year they would already have a winning record.

And again, remember---all people can complain about is what they see. Yet what they see may not even be half of it.

I get that some people don't trust the head coach. This causes them a lot of anxiety that I actually don't feel. But it's one thing to not trust the head coach, it;s another to do that to the point where you basically end up assuming--without, I know, consciously meaning to--that his actions come from a level of stupidity that would in fact normally keep someone from being allowed to drive. cool smiley So either you believe a coach knows when a rookie is ready to play, or you believe that fans in the stands who are simply not privy to that much info actually know more than he does about which qb is ready to play or not.

On that one I go with the far more likely scenario. It's not personal...I can't help but do that. I can't think of a good reason why I wouldn't do that.

...

...



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/29/2016 04:46AM by zn.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Nelson Spruce = Adam Humphries

Speed_Kills1179September 27, 2016 05:47AM

  you are right on the money

L.A.Rams501September 27, 2016 06:10AM

  He reminds me a little of Boldin

merlin393September 27, 2016 06:45AM

  Re: the sample size is so small

Speed_Kills502September 27, 2016 07:24AM

  Very true on the sample size, however I'll add this...

merlin456September 27, 2016 08:15AM

  Re: He reminds me a little of Boldin

six2stack509September 27, 2016 09:01AM

  Re: i know Snead openly compared Cooper

Speed_Kills358September 27, 2016 03:58PM

  Re: He reminds me a little of Boldin

CraigMatson371September 27, 2016 12:33PM

  Re: Nelson Spruce = Adam Humphries

EastBayRam624September 27, 2016 08:13AM

  Re: Nelson Spruce = Adam Humphries

stlramz444September 27, 2016 09:02AM

  Spruce seems slower than Humphries...just with very sure hands. imo

SunTzu_vs_Camus384September 28, 2016 08:23AM

  Re: yes I think you're right

Speed_Kills384September 28, 2016 09:54AM

  If he gets first downs like Proehl used to...

PeoriaRa321September 29, 2016 03:09PM

  IS he actually going to play in a game

ferragamo79340September 28, 2016 08:32AM

  Re: good point.... it would be nice

Speed_Kills382September 28, 2016 09:55AM

  Even if Spruce played....

JamesJM385September 28, 2016 11:31AM

  Re: Even if Spruce played....

Rams43582September 28, 2016 11:34AM

  I can't imagine otherwise...

JamesJM587September 28, 2016 11:44AM

  you know what all that tells me?

zn309September 28, 2016 06:05PM

  As you know, I don't see it that way.....

JamesJM366September 28, 2016 06:58PM

  Re: As you know, I don't see it that way.....

zn396September 28, 2016 07:01PM

  thats the heart of it...

JamesJM392September 28, 2016 07:05PM

  Re: thats the heart of it...

zn560September 28, 2016 07:26PM

  Re: I would add

Speed_Kills371September 29, 2016 01:56AM

  Re: I would add

zn406September 29, 2016 04:39AM

  False premise..

JamesJM294September 29, 2016 06:05AM

  Re: False premise..

zn513September 29, 2016 04:53PM

  Re: I would add

Speed_Kills341September 29, 2016 06:37AM

  Re: I would add

zn363September 29, 2016 05:07PM