Quote
Rams_78
You disagree.....op your opinion why but no just take the cheap shot
Imo ferragamo79 is pretty spot on...in fact grab a hold of this one
What could possibly go wrong ???
With O that has proven they can't run the ball (consistently week to week) and did what to improve it??
With an O the has a WR group that is a JOKE...like 79 posted double up CK and then what....Tutu (that's a solid go to #2)
With an O that has an OL that has been subpar, neglected, is in total flux with relatively young players & rookies now being looked at magically as if they are some tough, cohesive, dominating unit.
Yeah 5-7 wins is a pretty good # imo............ and Stafford is going to get hammered
But of course the O can fall back and count on that "Fearsome Foursome" RAM D to keep them in games lol
GO RAMS!!
What did Rams do to improve running the ball? First, the issue last year was injured online. Secondly, did you see who Rams drafted?
WR group a joke? Says you. Kupp one of top 2-3 WRs in NFL, Jefferson is no joke. Not all-pro, but no joke. Rookie has potential, Skow is a role player.
You can say they are not 1-5 all-stars but to say they are a "joke" is not defensible. A WR room with Kupp in it is never a joke. That os what being a Debbie Downer is. Exaggerating something without considering the facts.
OL could be a problem or they could be good. People assuming they will be bad based on 2022 injuries is was being negative is. COuld they be bad? Sure. Could they be vastly improved? Yes. I don't know. You don't know. So, when people on every matter chose to assume the worst rather than be fair or at least admit they don't know is being overly negative.
You call it a cheap shot. Okay. But so is calling the WR room a "joke". That's a cheap shot.
Goose, gander.
I have said for five months --- let's wait and see. Bold predictions based on nothing mean nothing. That includes overly positive and overly negative.
