Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

I'm gonna ask you for a favor.

March 19, 2023 01:18PM
Quote
Ramsdude


When I look at the players you mention above, is a defense with 3 hof'ers, Gaimes, Rapp and Scott all that bad? That's a pretty good core group of players.

Questions for you Deadpool.

How many other coaches would give their right arm to have 3 hof'ers on the D and to make it even better, have one HOF'er at each level?

Out of all the coaches that would love to have that talent, how many do think would only run a Prevent Defense behind them? None, including Morris. He is not running a prevent defense. It very much is a Fangio D.

Seems like a misuse of hof talent from having a lack of creativity. As I said before, we have the most unimaginative DC in the game. I don't see how it gets any better after losing the only talent he had to work with. Oh, the D will get worse before it gets better. For sure. But FA isn't over, the draft hasn't happened yet. I'm not ready to call time of death just yet.

Thanks again for the respectful reply Deadpool. You were able to get your points across without getting personal and insulting. Something some people have a very hard time doing! I very much appreciate that! beer cheer smiley

Now for my favor. I have posted this before. But I would love for you to read the article. Its a great piece from SI.com. It goes into great detail on how Morris schemed the Bengals for the SB. If you don't, thats fine. I just thought it might help you see that it isn't a 1 trick charmin shell, and that there is a heck of a lot more to his defense then meets the eye. Here are some parts I found very interesting:

[www.si.com]

Play 1
Rams 7, Bengals 0. 0:36 left in the first quarter. Third-and-10, ball at Rams’ 11.

The call was Crank 1 Y Special, with “Special” indicating there’d be double teams on the two receivers to the field (Chase and Boyd), and Ramsey would be on his own to the boundary. To disguise it, the Rams gave Burrow indicators that they were in a two-high or quarter/half look, before switching into the actual coverage at the snap.

Me: so yes Morris does disguise his coverages.

Play 2
Rams 13, Bengals 10. 0:48 left in the second quarter. Third-and-6, ball at Bengals’ 25.


Morris got the Rams in their “gold” front, which presented the overload to Burrow’s left and put Ramsey on Chase to that side—again putting the onus on his best corner, this time with showing just a single-high safety behind him, to buy his rush time.

Me: so they are showing man coverage with safety help over the top on Chase.

At the snap, Burrow looked to Chase. Ramsey had him. He then progressed, and the hope was that a postsnap switch to zone, after showing man presnap (and having Chase manned up to the outside) would get Burrow to hesitate. It did. The “Tess” pressure call got home on Morris’s bet that Burrow’s protection would slide to the overload. Leonard Floyd engaged left tackle Jonah Williams, Greg Gaines looped around Floyd, Williams slid to Gaines, and that freed Floyd to take down Burrow.

Me: so again a disguised coverage, designed to help get the pass rush home. And Floyd did. Thats good game planning, a good in game call and excellent execution. I'm not going to sit here and claim its all on Morris. Heck no, players have to execute.

Halftime

Mixon was averaging 5.7 yards per carry—so Morris talked to defensive line coach Eric Henderson on showing more five-man fronts to bottle that up. Second, Morris worked with secondary coaches Ejiro Evero and Jonathan Cooley on getting into dime, with a sixth defensive back, more on third down (something outside linebackers coach Chris Shula brought perspective on from the booth) as Morris planned to crank up the pressure over the second half.

Me: Does this sound like a 1 trick prevent pony to you? It doesn't seem like it to me.

It goes on with 3 more plays, all with short youtube videos. I find this kind of stuff really interesting. I hope everyone would give this a read. People may or may not think Morris is a good DC, or he plays a soft shell with no imagination, but I challenge anyone that reads this will have the same opinion. He knows football.

I will end with this and people can disagree with me, thats fine. I think not having Miller and Weddle really hurt last year. Weddle was such a heady veteran, and so much more cerebral than Rapp or Scott. And Miller just added such a dynamic pass rush and leadership to the front. So yes, IMO, I think Morris was limited more this year than in the SB run, but it wasn't just a charmin shell, no disguise, prevent defense all year.



Don't waste your time looking back, you're not going that way. - Ragnar Lothbrok
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  If our D was so good, why are we blowing it up?

Ramsdude375March 19, 2023 03:01AM

  Said all year, I thought the effort was lame too often.

Ramgator152March 19, 2023 03:34AM

  Hard to agrue with the lame effort Gator

Ramsdude145March 19, 2023 05:20AM

  Re: If our D was so good, why are we blowing it up?

AlbaNY_Ram154March 19, 2023 03:41AM

  A serious answer

JimYoungblood53170March 19, 2023 04:00AM

  Re: A serious answer

21Dog96March 19, 2023 05:57AM

  Now that is funny Dog! Well done!

Ramsdude136March 19, 2023 08:18AM

  Re: Now that is funny Dog! Well done!

BerendsenRam60March 19, 2023 12:05PM

  Re: If our D was so good, why are we blowing it up?

IowaRam94March 19, 2023 04:17AM

  Re: If our D was so good, why are we blowing it up?

LSURAM133March 19, 2023 04:35AM

  Very nice post as always AlbaNY!

Ramsdude186March 19, 2023 05:43AM

  Re: Very nice post as always AlbaNY!

Ramstien74March 19, 2023 05:56AM

  Re: If our D was so good, why are we blowing it up?

Rams4399March 19, 2023 07:22AM

  Re: If our D was so good, why are we blowing it up?

3030160March 19, 2023 06:03AM

  Good point 3030

Ramsdude92March 19, 2023 08:20AM

  Re: If our D was so good, why are we blowing it up?

RustyRay81March 19, 2023 08:23AM

  Re: If our D was so good, why are we blowing it up?

21Dog77March 19, 2023 10:12AM

  some answers and some questions

Deadpool98March 19, 2023 10:00AM

  Re: some answers and some questions

303073March 19, 2023 11:09AM

  Agree and disagree

JimYoungblood5382March 19, 2023 11:17AM

  Another nice response without making it personal

Ramsdude75March 19, 2023 11:42AM

  I'm gonna ask you for a favor.

Deadpool96March 19, 2023 01:18PM

  Thanks for posting that Deadpool

Ramsdude75March 19, 2023 01:40PM

  Fair enough

Deadpool96March 19, 2023 02:27PM

  Agreed.

Ramsdude51March 19, 2023 03:01PM

  Re: I'm gonna ask you for a favor.

ramBRO64March 19, 2023 01:48PM

  You too Bro? Attacking the poster not the opinion?

Ramsdude69March 19, 2023 01:55PM

  Re: Great questions and great answers! (must read)

BumRap61March 20, 2023 07:18AM

  An FYI on the current lack of Oldnotdead post imports…

Rams43104March 19, 2023 12:15PM

  I am ok with those oldnotdead posts 43.

Ramsdude80March 19, 2023 12:18PM

  Re: I am ok with those oldnotdead posts 43.

Rams4388March 19, 2023 12:22PM

  I totally understand 43

Ramsdude72March 19, 2023 12:39PM

  I heard he was old and DEAD

ferragamo7974March 19, 2023 03:03PM

  He and Mackeyser probably alive and screaming at clouds Attachments

JimYoungblood5374March 19, 2023 03:51PM

  Re: If our D was so good, why are we blowing it up?

h2omelonhead82March 19, 2023 03:13PM