Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

some answers and some questions

March 19, 2023 10:00AM
Quote
Ramsdude
Was McVay a little more unsatisfied with the D that we thought? Was he hoping Morris was going to be hired away but had to keep him when he wasn't? This is the defense McVay wants Morris to run. He wanted a Fangio style D and thats why he let go of Phillips, and hired a Fangio student in Staley. Morris comes from the cover 2 school from Monty Kiffin if I am correct. So Morris came in with the understanding that he would continue to run the Fangio scheme. I personally think Morris made the most he could with the ingredients he had. I know everyone hates the off coverage, but IMO and I will stress that its only my opinion, you just cant play alot of press man with a slow as molasses Kendrick at one corner and your 2 safeties that aren't exactly known for their pass defense in Rapp and Scott. If McVay didn't want to keep Morris, Morris would be gone. McVay has let go of plenty of coaches.

Wasn't the offense our problem? Our we "fixing" the wrong squad? Are we certain he isn't trying to fix both squads? It may be addition by subtraction on defense. It may take a little while, but hanging onto underperformers and guys that aren't playing up to their contracts isn't a great strategy either IMO.

Unloading star players on D left and right. Firing coaches on Morris's staff. Seeing McVay's face while the whiners were marching up and down the field, he didn't look too happy, makes me wonder just how big a fan of Morris McVay really is. As I have already stated, if he wanted Morris gone, he could be gone and he easily could have pursued Fangio himself. Could have the Rams landed him? Who knows, but they could have at least made the attempt.

The only good thing I can see is that maybe McVay is setting Morris up to fail so he can take his one page playbook and go play that soft crap somewhere else. Naw, its basically cutting off your nose to spite your face. My question for you is who are you actually mad at? Snead for bringing in players that can't play press man coverage? McVay for making Morris run the Fangio scheme in the first place, the players for simply not being up to the challenge or Morris for doing what he thinks is best given what he has to work with? For me, this falls on Snead and the scouting department.Find better players and players that fit the scheme McVay wants run.

I am sure McVay has a plan but WTH is it? lol

In the words of Vince Lombardi, "What the h3ll is going on out there???".

And if we really look hard at what the Rams have done on the defensive side of the ball, alot of these moves make sense. Not all, but alot of them.

Ramsey - very good CB. Amazing in run support, but he wanted a shiny new contract the Rams apparently weren't willing to give him. So they moved on. That was the best move for everyone involved. Does it suck? Yep. But longterm its the right move IMO.

Wagner - he wasn't a longterm answer at his age, so why kick the can down the road? Jones looks promising. Is he Wagner? No, not even close, but I think he is more than serviceable. And how often do 3-4 defensive teams have 2 ILBers on the field at the same time? Defenses are in nickel the majority of the time.

Floyd - He was vastly overpaid for his production. And if he was so amazing, given the emphasis teams put on getting good edge rushers, why hasn't he been snapped up yet? Are the Rams gonna miss his production? Oh yeah, but just not at that contract. And he had already been restructured, so that wasn't in the books.

Gaines - signed a 1 year deal worth what? If Gaines was such a vital piece of the defense, why didn't he Rams offer him a 3 year deal?

This one I have an issue with, as do I with Scott. If you are gonna go down the "F them picks" road, then you need to hit on later draft picks. Well, they hit on Gaines in the 4th round and Scott in the 7th round. They developed them into starters for a SB team and then let them go to other teams on contracts that didn't break the bank. I have no idea what Gaines is gonna make in NY, but on a 1 year deal, it cant be much. Scott is averaging 4m a year for 3 years and is 27? The vet min is something like 1m per, so you cannot tell me Scott wasn't worth 3m more than the minimum for 3 years...

Maybe I answered my own question, they think since they developed late round talents like Gaines and Scott and JJ3 and so on and so forth, they can do ith with guys like Lake, Yeast, the Brown boys, and so on. But I am just not thrilled with these 2 moves.

Rapp - I was a fan of his in college, but he is a box safety that simply cannot cover.

And realistically, the Rams haven't really been burnt by guys that left in FA. JJ3 was way overpaid by the Browns and was cut. Darius Williams was OK with Jax, but another ryear with no INTs. And at 5'-9", is limited with what you can do with him. Fowler hasn't done much either. the Rams make seemingly good decisions in regards to their own FAs. So I'll trust the process, but don't mistake that for me liking or agreeing with it.



Don't waste your time looking back, you're not going that way. - Ragnar Lothbrok
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  If our D was so good, why are we blowing it up?

Ramsdude374March 19, 2023 03:01AM

  Said all year, I thought the effort was lame too often.

Ramgator152March 19, 2023 03:34AM

  Hard to agrue with the lame effort Gator

Ramsdude145March 19, 2023 05:20AM

  Re: If our D was so good, why are we blowing it up?

AlbaNY_Ram154March 19, 2023 03:41AM

  A serious answer

JimYoungblood53170March 19, 2023 04:00AM

  Re: A serious answer

21Dog96March 19, 2023 05:57AM

  Now that is funny Dog! Well done!

Ramsdude135March 19, 2023 08:18AM

  Re: Now that is funny Dog! Well done!

BerendsenRam60March 19, 2023 12:05PM

  Re: If our D was so good, why are we blowing it up?

IowaRam94March 19, 2023 04:17AM

  Re: If our D was so good, why are we blowing it up?

LSURAM133March 19, 2023 04:35AM

  Very nice post as always AlbaNY!

Ramsdude186March 19, 2023 05:43AM

  Re: Very nice post as always AlbaNY!

Ramstien73March 19, 2023 05:56AM

  Re: If our D was so good, why are we blowing it up?

Rams4399March 19, 2023 07:22AM

  Re: If our D was so good, why are we blowing it up?

3030160March 19, 2023 06:03AM

  Good point 3030

Ramsdude92March 19, 2023 08:20AM

  Re: If our D was so good, why are we blowing it up?

RustyRay81March 19, 2023 08:23AM

  Re: If our D was so good, why are we blowing it up?

21Dog77March 19, 2023 10:12AM

  some answers and some questions

Deadpool97March 19, 2023 10:00AM

  Re: some answers and some questions

303072March 19, 2023 11:09AM

  Agree and disagree

JimYoungblood5382March 19, 2023 11:17AM

  Another nice response without making it personal

Ramsdude74March 19, 2023 11:42AM

  I'm gonna ask you for a favor.

Deadpool96March 19, 2023 01:18PM

  Thanks for posting that Deadpool

Ramsdude75March 19, 2023 01:40PM

  Fair enough

Deadpool95March 19, 2023 02:27PM

  Agreed.

Ramsdude51March 19, 2023 03:01PM

  Re: I'm gonna ask you for a favor.

ramBRO64March 19, 2023 01:48PM

  You too Bro? Attacking the poster not the opinion?

Ramsdude68March 19, 2023 01:55PM

  Re: Great questions and great answers! (must read)

BumRap60March 20, 2023 07:18AM

  An FYI on the current lack of Oldnotdead post imports…

Rams43104March 19, 2023 12:15PM

  I am ok with those oldnotdead posts 43.

Ramsdude79March 19, 2023 12:18PM

  Re: I am ok with those oldnotdead posts 43.

Rams4387March 19, 2023 12:22PM

  I totally understand 43

Ramsdude71March 19, 2023 12:39PM

  I heard he was old and DEAD

ferragamo7973March 19, 2023 03:03PM

  He and Mackeyser probably alive and screaming at clouds Attachments

JimYoungblood5374March 19, 2023 03:51PM

  Re: If our D was so good, why are we blowing it up?

h2omelonhead81March 19, 2023 03:13PM