You gotta catch that int.by Suh-weet! - Game Time Forum
QuoteSpeed_Kills No way Cards should have lost at home to the Patriots with no Brady or Gronk and 3 to 4 other starters The Cards aren't right Let's go Rams handle ur damn business! ... a solid-or-better performance by Keenum, and no injuries. Izzat too much to ask?by Suh-weet! - RamsFootballFans.com
Quotestlramz From his draft class, starting this season, he has the same # of TDs as DeAndre Hopkins. Of course, his have come from multiple forms rather than just as a WR but I have super high hopes for Tavon. He has been effective in a dumbed down offense. If the Rams 1st String OL plays like I suspect it will, I expect big things out of both him and Gurley starting tomorrow night. Injuriby Suh-weet! - RamsFootballFans.com
QuoteBobCarl Quotecool_hand_luke Saw the highlight of the Raiders rushing td...James(#53) got run over by the back on the way to the end zone. Hoping not to see that anymore with Ogletree. I saw that three .... I'm glad JL was playing for the Saints today. Fast-forward this video to the 40-second mark and watch who didn't shed a block JL is a good guy I'm glad to see gone - but lookedby Suh-weet! - RamsFootballFans.com
QuoteBlue and Gold he's able to do thinks that allow Donald to take chances. A very good player. Anyone who doesn't think so really doesn't get his role. Rams defensive tackles have different roles and stats will never show what Brockers does in base defense ... I think he's a good player, definitely above average and I definitely agree that his work free AD to shine. I also think Brockersby Suh-weet! - RamsFootballFans.com
Quoteazramfan He dominates when he wants too. No question we need to extend him. Cam Thomas nor other DT can stuff someone in the backfield for a loss 2 of 3 downs. I have seen Brockers do that. I have also seen him drop running backs for losses inside the 5 because the D was trying to get a safety. He takes up space ft of free up Donald. He is a man-child at times. He is no JAG. Let me repeat, Hby Suh-weet! - RamsFootballFans.com
QuoteRams_81 the problem is not the personnel he has gotten at QB it is that he can't get them to play up to their talent level. In fact, they all play below their talent level. He is bad developing QBs and any offensive player. Foles is like a star QB with the Eagles and Kelly leading them to the playoffs and is a disaster with the Rams. .... WHY? And for a more expensive guy, underaby Suh-weet! - RamsFootballFans.com
QuoteRams_81 Hundreds of games. Law of statistics and probability seldom is wrong unless there is some event that disrupts the pattern. Plus, Maybe he will get off season help away from the Rams coaching like Robinson did last year. That seems to have made a difference for Robinson so far. It's not like Fisher has had 100's of quarterbacks, much less guys he traded up to #1 for. THAT'S thby Suh-weet! - RamsFootballFans.com
Quotemax Cause what you'll find is a baseline established by someone looking for conformation bias. You will never get everyone to agree on who is a good pick and who is a bad pick, but you will find anyone who wants to make the Rams look good will skew the baseline in their favor, and vice versa. We've already seen it in this thread with zn saying the Rams were 60% successful with their 2nby Suh-weet! - RamsFootballFans.com
QuoteBilly_T QuoteSuh-weet! Obviously he would have been worth trading up for. TA is "undersized." I personally think he was worth trading up for, though you may well disagree. I think/hope he'll put that *debate* to rest. Barron is "undersized" for his position. Ogletree is a converted safety and "undersized" for MLB. The business about not trading up maby Suh-weet! - RamsFootballFans.com
QuoteRams43 And let's don't discount the fact that both Keenum and Mannion have played quite well this preseason, fellas. These two QB's have given Fisher the luxury of being patient with Goff's development. Goff will surely be our franchise QB one day. Picking that exact date looks kinda tricky, I know. But it's just a matter of time. Those pundits that have implied that Goff is a bustby Suh-weet! - RamsFootballFans.com
QuoteGreatRamNTheSky The reaction to 2 things here. 1. Two bad plays, the tipped ball interception and then the fumbled shotgun snap. 2. Fisher making him number 3 and inactive for game 1. A lot kneejerk reactionaries among media and fans, both very predictable. People love the negative and never see the positive. Fact is you go back and watch Goff in all 4 pre-season games and takeby Suh-weet! - RamsFootballFans.com
Quotemax The point is its very rare that an undersized player gets drafted high in the first round. Trading up for one is even rarer. The Rams traded up once fro an undersized player and got Tavon, and stood pat for an undersized player and got Donald. So what was the better move? ... that it all depends on how it works out. Drew Brees is "undersized" and Nick Foles is not. Would yby Suh-weet! - RamsFootballFans.com
QuoteRams_81 Goff will be a good player but not as good as he should be Even McNair given his tremendous physical talent underachieved. Fisher is simply bad with QBs and bad on the passing game and is actually overrated as a running game coach. (Although I will say Eddie George is one player that I felt played to his ability so you have to give credit there.) But overall, if you follow Fby Suh-weet! - RamsFootballFans.com
Yes, they were lucky enough to get him without trading up. Had they traded up , say, to 10 or 5 and picked up, would you be complaining about the trade up? Not sure what the point there is.by Suh-weet! - RamsFootballFans.com
Obviously he would have been worth trading up for. TA is "undersized." I personally think he was worth trading up for, though you may well disagree. I think/hope he'll put that *debate* to rest. Barron is "undersized" for his position. Ogletree is a converted safety and "undersized" for MLB. The business about not trading up makes no sense to me. If we agby Suh-weet! - RamsFootballFans.com
QuoteLMU93 If I had to pick a handful of the younger players (not rookies or established veterans) to show the most improvement this year this is who I'd pick: QB Case Keenum- may seem obvious but if Keenum can be that efficient game manager and leader on offense- for however long- it will make a huge difference. I want to see Goff come in because he's improved so much he's surpassed or at leaby Suh-weet! - RamsFootballFans.com
Quotezn Quotereggae Not something I want to spend much time on tho They spend more time in the nickel than in a base 4/3. Joyner is a good prospect for the nickel because not only does he cover inside, he is an attack missile hitting, and can blitz. They clearly targeted a guy for an important role with that particular package of skills. To me the rush to judgment on him sounds likeby Suh-weet! - RamsFootballFans.com
QuoteTonyHunter87 U can show videos all day but it doesn't show anything that looks like Case will break out. He is what he is. A career backup that can win a game in a pinch. Let's just be disappointed that Goff isn't starting instead of trying to sell Keenum as a good QB. ... but, by all means, wallow away!by Suh-weet! - RamsFootballFans.com
QuoteNewMexicoRam I'll be happy to let Goff sit on the bench for awhile. ... half this board will be trashing him.by Suh-weet! - RamsFootballFans.com
QuoteSpeed_Kills The point of the video is to say this is not a QB that sucks. He's a functional QB. Understand the Rams haven't had a functional QB for the majority of 2 and a half seasons Goff is projected as a franchise QB - unfortunately he has a steep learning curve and is not yet even functional. It is what it is ... has he ever been in this position: entering the season not only w/soby Suh-weet! - RamsFootballFans.com
Quotedzrams 31.9 42.7 47.7 That’s Keenum’s QBR progression. Clearly, it is showing an upward trajectory. That trajectory shows improvement which nearly renders meaningless the 31.9 QBR he posted in his rookie season. Keenum’s 2015 QBR with the Rams was 47.7. That’s higher than the rating for several notable names: Andrew Luck, Blake Bortles, Sam Bradford, Joe Flacco, Peyton Manning, andby Suh-weet! - RamsFootballFans.com
QuoteSpeed_Kills . .... that the same point needs to be made again and Again and AGAIN....by Suh-weet! - RamsFootballFans.com
Quotelaram 28. Los Angeles Rams 2015 record: 7-9 Preseason ranking: No. 29 The last quarterback to go first overall and not play in Week 1 was JaMarcus Russell in 2007, but the Rams' hands are tied. When you've got a quarterback in Case Keenum with a career 5-10 record and 38 career Total QBR, you have to start him instead. :confusedby Suh-weet! - RamsFootballFans.com
QuoteHazlet Hacksaw That will get him reps that he needs and not just scout team crap. .... they think Goff is? I'm REALLY glad they're not force-feeding him into the starting role - good for the team, good for him. But unless they think he's WAAAAY behind Mannion, I'd like to see him as #2 asap. It would mean dressing for games and being in the sidelines on gameday as well as getting more mby Suh-weet! - RamsFootballFans.com
QuoteBilly_T QuoteRams43 By: Jeff Smith | 43 minutes ago For all you Los Angeles Rams fans out there, here’s your fair warning. Not only will running back Todd Gurley not receive 30 carries per game (which would be unbelievable), but he also doesn’t want 30 carries either. In a story by Bleacher Report’s Dan Pompei, Gurley opened up about the 2016 season, the Rams running game and alsoby Suh-weet! - RamsFootballFans.com
QuoteFlorida_Ram QuoteSuh-weet! Quotezn QuoteHazlet Hacksaw I just think he got overwhelmed when he got no protection. Its just a time issue with him. IMO? If the issue is knowing the offense and being able to operate it quickly and effectively like 2nd nature---calling protections, calling audibles, reading sight adjustments--- then practicing with the ones would make no difference. He hasby Suh-weet! - RamsFootballFans.com