simply because there is no way of knowing who we could have picked instead in terms of how that player would have played for us.
IMO if a guy like 1 of those centers plays well someplace else, or flops doesn't show that he would have done the same here. Same for any other position we could have chosen. IMO a player picked is just as much dealt his deal with the coaching and players around him...the team that chooses him. If Tutu does well here in no way means he would have done the same elsewhere, nor does anyone else we may have chosen just as much as if he flops here mean how he would have done anywhere else...as like any other player in that same situation.
I don't like comparing players so much on other teams because so much of that players game is activated by those around him.....many players can play well anywhere they go, but they may not have the same "game". Look at Robert Woods...some thought he was not a good choice because of his #'s in Buffalo....look at him here...many times a guys game is a lot or at least somewhat dictated by the team he is on, how he is used or not used.
IMO we can only look at Tutu in 1 way, that he stay upright enough to show his game, not be all this or that in comparison to others, but just be worthy for us......
