I don't either, but I don't see a trade to get someone...If they do that IMO they will need to actually put that guy into next years plans and beyond....That takes even more away from limited $'s to deal with a heavy need at LT, and across the line with everyone pretty much on a last year look.

If they choose to rid themselves of a player it has to be a player a team would want, they would have to be as interested in that player as they are with the person they are trading, and same for the RAMS.....

I think they do get someone, but as a 1 year deal. Just would not make a trade for a RB and lose him next season basically you lose 2 players (him and the guy you traded)....IMO there will be plenty of guys who can fill the role..IMO that role is a rotational type guy, not a bell cow.....I can't see trading for a guy like that...picking up a cut, choosing from the vets without a team yes that's who I see them getting....

Cam could have been that end all big time guy for us this season with his season last year....yes he came on big time at the end, yes a person normally takes that and pushes it into the next season and assumes that same play but for a full season. But really DH was just a yard off his totals and had more TD's (I think)....true it wasn't at the end of the season so it doesn't seem as big, but DH's play did help us win games at the front end of the year.....They made a great mix IMO and I think that the RAMS can do the same this season but not by way of needing to trade to get it...

.Be nice if Jones came on and they added a solid vet to the group...make it a 3 headed backfield....trick to that is you need guys who can do it at anytime when called...isn't easy but it can happen.