Re: and as I pointed out, they are all bad options
| May 04, 2021 09:39PM |
Quote
zn
Quote
Rams43
Quote
zn
Quote
Rams43
You answered your own question by listing all the general options, zn. It will be one of those listed options.
.
And as I pointed out--you cannot count on any of those options.
That was the entire point.
How did you manage to miss that?
Bad or not, those are still the options. Rams will choose the best option for them and probably keep drafting LOT’s until they’re satisfied.
And btw, extending Boom is not really a ‘bad’ option. Might not be your ideal solution, but it’s not really a ‘bad’ option.
Yeah extending NB is a bad option. It means the OL goes down a peg in quality.
What you didn't follow in this is that some of them are bad options because they have slim odds of actually working. If you follow the argument--that's not a matter of opinion.
Sign a FA? Starting caliber LOTs hardly ever make it to the market. You can't sign guys if there aren't any.
Draft one? Pretty much can't if you don't have a 1st round pick. I did the numbers, they're the odds are against finding a starting LOT after round 1.
Their best (and in fact only good) option is to trade up into round 1.
...
....
I’m gonna go waaaaay out on a limb and guess that Rams have already weighed all the pros and cons of this LOT issue in ‘22. It won’t catch them unprepared.
So, I’m gonna kick back and enjoy this ‘21 season and worry about LOT next year.
