Quote
zn

Quote
Rams43

Quote
zn

Quote
dzrams

Quote
Rams43
Frankly, I enjoyed reading it and am glad it was posted.

I’m invested in the Rams and their betterment, not in any individual player. So, ‘if the shoe fits’ regarding Goff, so be it. I’ve long since moved on.

It's a good article but, as usual, the headline is kind of clickbait. Of course, that seems to be by design as you point out.

To be accurate the headline should say "Sean McVay hints ex-QB Jared Goff can’t read defenses as well as Stafford can" That would be 100% true and I don't know that anyone would have a problem with it.

Who's going to disagree that Stafford can recognize and understand coverage and make all five eligibles come alive at a higher level than Goff? Or that he's superior to Goff in getting through progressions, recognizing reads, and solving problems protection-wise? I doubt we have any real serious disagreement with that.

No one has ever disagreed with that that I know of.

But then look at the reactions of your buddies. Me or R2K saying basically the same thing you just did here and it provokes this fury of ruffled feather misreads and over-reactions.

In all fairness, you should honestly think about why you contribute to that impulse.

...

What fury? What over-reactions? Look in the mirror, zn.

Oh believe me, lol, no mirror needed. As I said, whenever these kinds of pile-ons happen, the guys who tend to defend Goff manage to handle the over-reactions without responding in kind. Read the whole thread.

Here's what is needed.

Explain why when I say the exact same thing about Goff and reading defenses that dz did, you agreed with him and disagreed with me.

...