Re: An article destined to ruffle some feathers...
| April 17, 2021 09:34AM |
Quote
Rams43
Quote
zn
Quote
Rams43
You say it’s not a good article. Is it ‘not good’ because you disagree with it? .
If you believed in "to each his own" you would not seek out every real or perceived defense of Goff to join the pile-on. You would also have listened to the vid I provided.
Meanwhile this is why it's not a good article.
It claims McVay said something he did not say. In fact not only did McVay not say it, the claim is preposterous in its own right. Whatever else you may think of Goff, a qb does not contribute to 4 winning seasons if he is simply incapable of reading defenses.
If you cannot read defenses at all, then you are in Johnny Manziel territory.
Either way McVay said a lot of things about Goff. He did not say he simply cannot read defenses
....
Firstly, I had already seen the video. McVay did not of course come right out and say that Goff ‘simply cannot read a D
Of course he didn't because he's neither incompetent nor stupid.
Meanwhile you just now agreed with dz for saying something that is quite simply NO different from what I said.
What I said:
Quote
. [ramsrule.com]
Sorry but he does not say Goff can't read defenses.
I like Stafford. No problems there as far as I am concerned.
But I also like to be an accurate historian.
Does a 13 year vet react to defenses more effectively than a 5 year vet? Yeah, obviously, and duh. That not only makes the 2021 Stafford more effective than the 2020 Goff, it also makes him more effective than the 2013 Stafford.
Why do you argue with that when I say it but agree with it entirely when dz says it?
