For point one, I'll wait and see on that. I don't take the lack of a denial as necessarily an indication of anything. That might not feel the need to address it because they'll have a chance to get their side out. I'll wait that one out.
As for point two, what would happen if/when the Rams
do come out and deny those reports? What then? Who's the liar? We could get into some really fuzzy distinctions here about lying, misremembering, or what have you. Arguing in the alternative, what would be a big deal in calling Goff a liar? Or Snead or McVay for that matter? Having said that, I don't think you can call someone a liar after one fib. They were lying, yes. We'd have to see repeat offenses to make that claim. But I digress.
As for me, I've been in jobs with passive-aggressive bosses. I'm not like that, and obviously I don't care for it (who does), but I'm also observant enough to know when something is wrong, and it seems from those same reports that Goff knew something was different than the past couple of years. It also isn't hard to put two and two together. Basic cause and effect intuition.
It's not really about what
I think is right, at least from my point of view. That's not what I'm talking about.
I just wanna know what really happened lol.
