Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Michael Brockers is gone

January 31, 2020 12:17PM
Quote
tonyde
Quote
zn
Quote
max
They need the money elsewhere beyond a run stuffer. Outside of some diehard Rams fans, no one thinks he has much value.

I don't agree. I think he was undervalued in a thankless role. And I mean by Rams fans.

Look around the league. How many straight-up 3/4 DEs have big stats. It's rare.

I do agree he’s been underrated, but he’s also been overpaid. And with him hitting free agency at a old 29, I think there’s very little chance he’s in horns next year. Will be too expensive to to stop the run for this this team. Will definitely miss his leadership

He was paid exactly the going rate guys at his position were getting for 2nd contracts the year he came up.

Stephon Tuitt of the Steelers is also a respected classic 5-tech style 3/4 DE, had almost half the number of qb pressures MB did, and is paid about 1 M more than Brockers. Why more? He signed a year later than MB did.

2nd contracts work this way--if a guy is a starter, and you want to keep him, you give him the going rate for his position that year. Or you don't pay him and he walks.

I have been saying for over a year now that MB would walk after his 2nd contract is up. So this is not about keeping him. But I also hope they can replace him.

.,...
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Michael Brockers Twitter post...

Deadhead Ram1127January 31, 2020 08:48AM

  Michael Brockers is gone

max401January 31, 2020 08:57AM

  Re: Michael Brockers is gone

Deadhead Ram339January 31, 2020 08:59AM

  Bingo

Los Angeles Lenny537January 31, 2020 09:05AM

  Re: Michael Brockers is gone

zn458January 31, 2020 09:17AM

  Re: Michael Brockers is gone

max424January 31, 2020 10:03AM

  Re: Michael Brockers is gone

zn358January 31, 2020 12:07PM

  Re: Michael Brockers is overpaid

max292January 31, 2020 01:31PM

  Re: Michael Brockers is overpaid

zn351January 31, 2020 03:26PM

  In the days of fantasy football...

roman18260January 31, 2020 10:41AM

  I disagree

no name294January 31, 2020 12:19PM

  Are analytics based on statistics?

roman18211February 01, 2020 05:06AM

  Re: Are analytics based on statistics?

no name216February 01, 2020 06:58AM

  Re: Are analytics based on statistics?

zn227February 01, 2020 07:14AM

  Re: Michael Brockers is gone

tonyde210January 31, 2020 10:54AM

  Re: Michael Brockers is gone

zn199January 31, 2020 12:17PM

  Yup, agreed as well. (nm)

JamesJM193January 31, 2020 11:31AM

  Re: Michael Brockers is gone

stlramz202January 31, 2020 02:44PM

  Of course. We've all known it, he knows it, it's just logical.

RockRam328January 31, 2020 11:08AM

  Re: Of course. We've all known it, he knows it, it's just logical.

SoCalRAMatic215January 31, 2020 11:14AM

  Re: Of course. We've all known it, he knows it, it's just logical.

LMU93229January 31, 2020 11:29AM

  Re: Of course. We've all known it, he knows it, it's just logical.

zn328January 31, 2020 12:18PM

  Re: Of course. We've all known it, he knows it, it's just logical.

zn208January 31, 2020 12:52PM

  to drive this home

zn214February 01, 2020 05:36AM

  Re: Of course. We've all known it, he knows it, it's just logical.

six2stack262February 01, 2020 05:24AM

  Re: Michael Brockers is gone

73Ram212February 01, 2020 03:44AM

  Re: Michael Brockers is gone

george_allen222February 01, 2020 03:57PM

  Re: Michael Brockers Twitter post...

3030290January 31, 2020 09:14AM

  Pretty basic perfect situation ...

alyoshamucci270February 01, 2020 10:14AM