January 24, 2020 12:40PM
Quote
Rampage2K-

.

Meanwhile you're the one on here arguing with just about everyone on this thread that you know more about the issues than Andrewlol3

Sorry, zn....I will take AW's word over yours everyday and twice on Sundays...but hey! The line played better in the second half......

You actually think I said I know more than AW? I said his argument doesn't hold up. To deal with that, you actually have to address the argument, not just throw around personal slams.

And surely you are not the person to argue that if others disagree you MUST be wrong. A lot of your posts would be very different if you actually believed that. Like ones where you and I were virtually alone in defending Goff. Right? cool smiley

Meanwhile, here's where you don't make a case. Or even try.

1. In spite of what he says, Sullivan was a liability at the end in 2018, and when Blythe moved to center, he played better than Sullivan was toward the end. So much for the irreplaceable Sullivan.

2. In spite of what he says, a line DID play well with THREE inexperienced newbies. Of course by then 2 other problems were gone--AW had stopped his decline by then and Hav got benched. So much for the you can''t play well with young players---when that was far from the only issue.

I didn't like them losing Saffold, but no the issues did not just boil down to losing Saffold and Sullivan. That does not hold up. And you're not making a case holding it up.

....



Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 01/24/2020 12:51PM by zn.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Andrew Whitworth: Rams' struggles boiled down to losing Saffold, Sullivan

RamBill984January 24, 2020 05:29AM

  with all due respect...no they didn't

zn460January 24, 2020 05:31AM

  Yeah, what could that Whitworth guy know?

RockRam351January 24, 2020 05:53AM

  Re: Yeah, what could that Whitworth guy know?

SB34RAMS1284January 24, 2020 06:00AM

  He would know to put a certain spin on things.

zn314January 24, 2020 06:45AM

  Re: He would know to put a certain spin on things.

Rampage2K-252January 24, 2020 07:46AM

  you misread

zn247January 24, 2020 08:04AM

  Re: +++1 on the "weightier opinion"

dzrams176January 24, 2020 08:36AM

  interested party v. analysis

zn170January 24, 2020 08:45AM

  Maybe this will help you.... the actual video of the interview

Rampage2K-180January 24, 2020 08:51AM

  saw it long before this

zn159January 24, 2020 09:02AM

  Re: saw it long before this

Rampage2K-164January 24, 2020 09:38AM

  now you're mishearing AW

zn188January 24, 2020 09:59AM

  Re: now you're mishearing AW

Rampage2K-277January 24, 2020 11:34AM

  Re: now you're mishearing AW

zn154January 24, 2020 12:16PM

  Re: now you're mishearing AW

Rampage2K-250January 24, 2020 12:19PM

  Re: now you're mishearing AW

zn156January 24, 2020 12:40PM

  Run blocking

moklerman152January 24, 2020 09:55AM

  Re: Run blocking

Rampage2K-317January 24, 2020 12:22PM

  Re: Run blocking

zn147January 24, 2020 12:31PM

  Re: I vote to defer to the 13 year vet...

dzrams160January 24, 2020 08:34AM

  interested party problem--when analysis does not hold up it does not hold up

zn158January 24, 2020 08:57AM

  Re: interested party problem--when analysis does not hold up it does not hold up

dzrams160January 24, 2020 09:25AM

  Re: interested party problem--when analysis does not hold up it does not hold up

Rampage2K-165January 24, 2020 09:41AM

  Re: interested party problem--when analysis does not hold up it does not hold up

zn138January 24, 2020 09:44AM

  Re: How about this...

dzrams166January 24, 2020 10:11AM

  Re: How about this...

zn150January 24, 2020 12:46PM

  Re: Enough!

dzrams184January 24, 2020 01:07PM

  On AW..

sacram177January 24, 2020 09:48AM

  yep

zn167January 24, 2020 10:05AM

  Re: On AW..

dzrams183January 24, 2020 10:08AM

  Re: On AW..

sacram250January 24, 2020 11:34AM

  Re: On AW..

dzrams270January 24, 2020 12:04PM

  Re: On AW..

sacram195January 24, 2020 12:56PM

  Re: with all due respect...no they didn't

bigjimram21186January 24, 2020 12:37PM

  Re: with all due respect...no they didn't

zn150January 24, 2020 02:22PM

  Re: with all due respect...no they didn't

bigjimram21280January 25, 2020 07:29AM

  Continuity and youth

no name197January 24, 2020 01:49PM

  obviously a case can be made for Saffold

21Dog320January 24, 2020 05:37AM

  Re: obviously a case can be made for Saffold

zn198January 24, 2020 05:41AM

  Sullivan

Ram_Ruler234January 24, 2020 05:46AM

  Re: Sullivan

zn172January 24, 2020 05:53AM

  That's true

Ram_Ruler152January 24, 2020 06:05AM

  depends

zn167January 24, 2020 06:52AM

  It boiled down to he is old

Rams_81205January 24, 2020 07:19AM

  Re: if only we drafted Lewan instead of G Rob....

spagsbacker164January 24, 2020 07:41AM

  "Boiled down to"

moklerman182January 24, 2020 08:11AM

  Re: "Boiled down to"

zn228January 24, 2020 08:33AM

  Re: "Boiled down to"

moklerman175January 24, 2020 09:35AM

  ssshhhhhh dont tell some posters here that

ferragamo79199January 24, 2020 11:58AM

  Re: Andrew Whitworth: Rams' struggles boiled down to losing Saffold, Sullivan

Classicalwit224January 24, 2020 03:37PM