Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Run blocking

January 24, 2020 12:31PM
Quote
Rampage2K-
Quote
moklerman
When AW mentions Saffold and Sullivan he's specifically talking about run blocking too. He isn't defending Sullivan as playing well overall and not being replaceable. This whole thread seems to be a strawman argument.

Exactly.....I don't know what is so hard to believe or disagree withconfused smiley

Okay, so for you, Sullivan in the 2nd half of 2018 was a plus in terms of run blocking, was not an exploitable weakness, and was not replaceable?

In spite of the fact that teams that did attack Sullivan saw him as a liability (and they were right) and when they did so they DID shut down the running game?

And Blythe in the 2nd half of 2019, in spite of being younger, did replace a worn out Sullivan and play on a line that did better than it did toward the end of 2018,

I don't see what there is to AGREE with in what AW says about Sullivan.

And you won't be able to make a case that defends it either. Not if you want to use facts.

But hey a player spoke so echo it (unless of course it's Ramsey or a list of others I could name, but you know what I mean, agree with players except when you don't.) cool smiley
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Andrew Whitworth: Rams' struggles boiled down to losing Saffold, Sullivan

RamBill977January 24, 2020 05:29AM

  with all due respect...no they didn't

zn456January 24, 2020 05:31AM

  Yeah, what could that Whitworth guy know?

RockRam347January 24, 2020 05:53AM

  Re: Yeah, what could that Whitworth guy know?

SB34RAMS1282January 24, 2020 06:00AM

  He would know to put a certain spin on things.

zn310January 24, 2020 06:45AM

  Re: He would know to put a certain spin on things.

Rampage2K-250January 24, 2020 07:46AM

  you misread

zn243January 24, 2020 08:04AM

  Re: +++1 on the "weightier opinion"

dzrams174January 24, 2020 08:36AM

  interested party v. analysis

zn166January 24, 2020 08:45AM

  Maybe this will help you.... the actual video of the interview

Rampage2K-176January 24, 2020 08:51AM

  saw it long before this

zn157January 24, 2020 09:02AM

  Re: saw it long before this

Rampage2K-161January 24, 2020 09:38AM

  now you're mishearing AW

zn186January 24, 2020 09:59AM

  Re: now you're mishearing AW

Rampage2K-275January 24, 2020 11:34AM

  Re: now you're mishearing AW

zn150January 24, 2020 12:16PM

  Re: now you're mishearing AW

Rampage2K-248January 24, 2020 12:19PM

  Re: now you're mishearing AW

zn153January 24, 2020 12:40PM

  Run blocking

moklerman150January 24, 2020 09:55AM

  Re: Run blocking

Rampage2K-315January 24, 2020 12:22PM

  Re: Run blocking

zn143January 24, 2020 12:31PM

  Re: I vote to defer to the 13 year vet...

dzrams159January 24, 2020 08:34AM

  interested party problem--when analysis does not hold up it does not hold up

zn154January 24, 2020 08:57AM

  Re: interested party problem--when analysis does not hold up it does not hold up

dzrams156January 24, 2020 09:25AM

  Re: interested party problem--when analysis does not hold up it does not hold up

Rampage2K-161January 24, 2020 09:41AM

  Re: interested party problem--when analysis does not hold up it does not hold up

zn136January 24, 2020 09:44AM

  Re: How about this...

dzrams162January 24, 2020 10:11AM

  Re: How about this...

zn148January 24, 2020 12:46PM

  Re: Enough!

dzrams180January 24, 2020 01:07PM

  On AW..

sacram172January 24, 2020 09:48AM

  yep

zn164January 24, 2020 10:05AM

  Re: On AW..

dzrams181January 24, 2020 10:08AM

  Re: On AW..

sacram247January 24, 2020 11:34AM

  Re: On AW..

dzrams267January 24, 2020 12:04PM

  Re: On AW..

sacram190January 24, 2020 12:56PM

  Re: with all due respect...no they didn't

bigjimram21183January 24, 2020 12:37PM

  Re: with all due respect...no they didn't

zn148January 24, 2020 02:22PM

  Re: with all due respect...no they didn't

bigjimram21279January 25, 2020 07:29AM

  Continuity and youth

no name193January 24, 2020 01:49PM

  obviously a case can be made for Saffold

21Dog318January 24, 2020 05:37AM

  Re: obviously a case can be made for Saffold

zn196January 24, 2020 05:41AM

  Sullivan

Ram_Ruler230January 24, 2020 05:46AM

  Re: Sullivan

zn170January 24, 2020 05:53AM

  That's true

Ram_Ruler149January 24, 2020 06:05AM

  depends

zn163January 24, 2020 06:52AM

  It boiled down to he is old

Rams_81202January 24, 2020 07:19AM

  Re: if only we drafted Lewan instead of G Rob....

spagsbacker160January 24, 2020 07:41AM

  "Boiled down to"

moklerman178January 24, 2020 08:11AM

  Re: "Boiled down to"

zn224January 24, 2020 08:33AM

  Re: "Boiled down to"

moklerman171January 24, 2020 09:35AM

  ssshhhhhh dont tell some posters here that

ferragamo79195January 24, 2020 11:58AM

  Re: Andrew Whitworth: Rams' struggles boiled down to losing Saffold, Sullivan

Classicalwit222January 24, 2020 03:37PM