Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

it's the law

July 07, 2019 09:10AM
Quote
Ekern55
I think is worth fighting (and I use that word intentionally) against is the changing of the goal posts.

It's the law. No goal posts were "changed." The charge meets the definition of misdemeanor sexual assault.

You have a party, and your wife is in bed. One of the male guests feels her up in her bed (which means deliberately entering the bedroom).

She complains. When she does, do you go "quit switching the goalposts, that's not assault. Context explains all this." In fact what kind of husband would do that.

And that's aside from knowing the law.

On the law. In all cases the issue is consent.

Quote

from California Sexual Battery (Assault) Laws (Penal Code 243.4 PC)

Here are some examples of misdemeanor sexual assault:

Intentionally fondling a female stranger's breast without permission, or
Putting your hands on someone else's buttocks without first obtaining consent to do so.

Quote

from CHAPTER 9. Assault and Battery [240 - 248] [leginfo.legislature.ca.gov]
(e) (1) Any person who touches an intimate part of another person, if the touching is against the will of the person touched, and is for the specific purpose of sexual arousal, sexual gratification, or sexual abuse, is guilty of misdemeanor sexual battery, punishable by a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars ($2,000), or by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding six months, or by both that fine and imprisonment.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 07/07/2019 09:20AM by zn.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Trial for Ted Rath, Rams' strength and performance coach, begins in Ventura

Anonymous User1047July 05, 2019 06:04PM

  its do or die for coach Rath

stlramz424July 05, 2019 07:21PM

  Re: its do or die for coach Rath

Classicalwit359July 06, 2019 04:17AM

  Re: its do or die for coach Rath

VANRAM300July 06, 2019 09:29AM

  IMO here's the thing with this guy.....

roman18326July 06, 2019 10:29AM

  or

zn236July 06, 2019 11:12AM

  Re: its do or die for coach Rath

cool_hand_luke286July 08, 2019 08:40AM

  Re: its do or die for coach Rath

Rams43176July 08, 2019 08:49AM

  Re: its do or die for coach Rath

zn163July 08, 2019 09:02AM

  Re: its do or die for coach Rath

cool_hand_luke191July 08, 2019 10:15AM

  Re: its do or die for coach Rath

zn269July 08, 2019 10:28AM

  is that how you see it? really?

SunTzu_vs_Camus233July 08, 2019 08:47AM

  Re: its do or die for coach Rath

73Ram335July 06, 2019 04:56AM

  +1.....nm

Arkansas Ram236July 06, 2019 05:03AM

  What, exactly, is he accused of? (nm)

RockRam303July 06, 2019 06:35AM

  Re: What, exactly, is he accused of? (nm)

73Ram402July 06, 2019 06:56AM

  Re: What, exactly, is he accused of? (nm)

zn395July 06, 2019 11:16AM

  Re: What, exactly, is he accused of? (nm)

Classicalwit290July 06, 2019 12:04PM

  Re: What, exactly, is he accused of? (nm)

zn229July 06, 2019 02:33PM

  Re: What, exactly, is he accused of? (nm)

AlbaNY_Ram234July 06, 2019 05:51PM

  Re: its do or die for coach Rath

stlramz214July 06, 2019 10:52AM

  Re: its do or die for coach Rath

waterfield320July 06, 2019 12:15PM

  Everybody knows he is innocent . . .

stlramz314July 06, 2019 03:32PM

  Re: Everybody knows he is innocent . . .So?

den-the-coach378July 07, 2019 04:32AM

  Re: Everybody knows he is innocent . . .So?

stlramz232July 07, 2019 07:25PM

  More info here...

tonyde362July 06, 2019 10:30AM

  Poberesky is a very good trial attorney

waterfield333July 06, 2019 12:23PM

  We might be missing all kinds of context here, y’all...

Rams43260July 07, 2019 07:36AM

  Re: We might be missing all kinds of context here, y’all...

zn310July 07, 2019 08:16AM

  Re: We might be missing all kinds of context here, y’all...

Ekern55274July 07, 2019 08:49AM

  it's the law

zn251July 07, 2019 09:10AM

  Re: it's the law

Ekern55190July 07, 2019 09:15AM

  Re: it's the law

zn333July 07, 2019 09:27AM

  Re: it's the law

Ekern55192July 07, 2019 09:41AM

  Re: it's the law

zn206July 07, 2019 09:47AM

  Re: it's the law

Ekern55190July 08, 2019 06:40PM

  Re: it's the law

zn341July 08, 2019 08:32PM

  ???

waterfield197July 07, 2019 10:45AM

  Re: ???

Ekern55255July 08, 2019 06:52PM

  Re: ???

waterfield152July 08, 2019 08:07PM

  Re: it's the law

bigjimram21259July 07, 2019 06:21PM

  Re: it's the law

zn346July 07, 2019 06:49PM

  Re: it's the law

bigjimram21146July 08, 2019 08:39PM

  Re: it's the law

zn182July 08, 2019 09:49PM

  Some info from the prosecution's opening statement

AlbaNY_Ram347July 07, 2019 08:25AM

  Seriously ?

waterfield284July 07, 2019 10:57AM

  Re: Seriously ?

Rams43219July 07, 2019 11:09AM

  Re: Seriously ?

waterfield235July 07, 2019 11:27AM

  Re: Seriously ?

zn433July 07, 2019 12:02PM

  Re: Seriously ?

k3348July 07, 2019 01:12PM

  Re: Seriously ?

zn344July 07, 2019 01:37PM

  Re: Seriously ?

k3305July 08, 2019 10:16AM

  Re: Seriously ?

zn187July 08, 2019 10:31AM

  Re: Seriously ?

k3179July 08, 2019 04:11PM

  Re: Seriously ?

zn186July 08, 2019 04:38PM

  Re: Seriously ?

bigjimram21187July 07, 2019 06:31PM

  Re: Seriously ?

zn210July 07, 2019 06:56PM

  Re: Seriously ?

bigjimram21191July 08, 2019 08:44PM

  +1 (nm)

zn200July 08, 2019 09:50PM

  Re: We might be missing all kinds of context here, y’all...

bigjimram21224July 07, 2019 06:16PM

  Two schools of thought going on here

waterfield241July 07, 2019 08:26PM

  Re: Two schools of thought going on here

zn434July 07, 2019 08:35PM

  Re: Two schools of thought going on here

waterfield223July 08, 2019 06:54AM

  Re: Two schools of thought going on here

zn213July 08, 2019 08:28AM

  Re: Two schools of thought going on here

waterfield385July 08, 2019 08:57AM

  I didn't gender it

zn260July 08, 2019 09:11AM

  Re: I didn't gender it

waterfield283July 08, 2019 10:09AM

  Re: Two schools of thought going on here

bigjimram21192July 08, 2019 08:51PM