May 09, 2019 05:48AM
Quote

So if you are going to take anything away from that article in relation to the 60% number it is DON'T DO IT. And especially don't spend 60% on only 8-9 people. YIKES.


It's up to 60% but beyond is trouble.

I said that in the first post you responded to in this subthread.

Quote

teams spend up to 60% of their cap on 10 high contract players.

And the article never says don't do 60%.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  rams free agency 2020

PHDram863May 08, 2019 08:50AM

  Re: rams free agency 2020

Rams43283May 08, 2019 09:15AM

  Re: rams free agency 2020

SoCalRAMatic247May 08, 2019 09:31AM

  Brockers is still in his prime time....

roman18257May 08, 2019 10:40AM

  Re: Brockers is still in his prime time....

Rams43236May 08, 2019 10:54AM

  Re: Brockers is still in his prime time....

PHDram231May 08, 2019 11:04AM

  There's the point I make about Brockers....

roman18220May 08, 2019 11:47AM

  Brockers is the last remaining player from the RG3 trade

Rams Junkie168May 09, 2019 08:31AM

  Re: Brockers is still in his prime time....

zn221May 08, 2019 04:10PM

  Re: Brockers is still in his prime time....

PARAM201May 09, 2019 01:46AM

  Re: Brockers is still in his prime time....

zn349May 09, 2019 05:55AM

  I think they extend Goff

ferragamo79341May 08, 2019 09:40AM

  That doesn't have to impact 2020's cap

AlbaNY_Ram243May 08, 2019 10:15AM

  4 years for $147 million?

jemach223May 08, 2019 04:05PM

  Re: 4 years for $147 million?

AlbaNY_Ram215May 08, 2019 06:59PM

  Exactly

zn186May 09, 2019 11:15AM

  Re: 4 years for $147 million?

reggae235May 08, 2019 10:34PM

  overthecap.com shows the Rams with over $64M for 2020

AlbaNY_Ram240May 08, 2019 09:57AM

  hope they are right

PHDram214May 08, 2019 10:33AM

  Here's the problem

AlbaNY_Ram271May 08, 2019 12:21PM

  Good work!

PHDram183May 09, 2019 03:56AM

  Re: rams free agency 2020

GroundPounder234May 08, 2019 10:20AM

  Re: rams free agency 2020

Classicalwit199May 08, 2019 11:28AM

  Re: rams free agency 2020

zn257May 08, 2019 12:52PM

  but is it true?

CeeZar224May 08, 2019 04:18PM

  Re: but is it true?

zn219May 08, 2019 05:53PM

  The referenced article debunks the myth

CeeZar268May 09, 2019 04:19AM

  no

zn189May 09, 2019 05:48AM

  Re: The referenced article debunks the myth

PHDram179May 09, 2019 05:48AM

  Re: The referenced article debunks the myth

zn180May 09, 2019 05:58AM

  Re: The referenced article debunks the myth

CeeZar214May 09, 2019 06:27AM

  sure there is

PHDram211May 09, 2019 07:10AM

  Re: sure there is

CeeZar215May 09, 2019 07:55AM

  well there is evidence

PHDram173May 09, 2019 08:25AM

  Re: well there is evidence

CeeZar305May 09, 2019 10:02AM

  Excel, access to the internet, and too much time

PHDram173May 09, 2019 10:23AM

  uh oh...they are at 58 now

PHDram171May 09, 2019 09:15AM

  breaking this down, it's not very daunting

LMU93215May 09, 2019 05:24AM

  Sounds about right

BC Ramsfan226May 09, 2019 07:13AM

  i dont agree with alot of this tbh

PHDram259May 09, 2019 07:43AM