Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

i dont agree with alot of this tbh

May 09, 2019 07:43AM
littleton: as they rams have demonstrated as of late i dont think they are willing to shell out money to an ilb. i could be wrong but i believe littleton will be gone if for no other reason then his position.

brockers: you know hat you have with brockers. hes good and reliable but not spectacular. if they want him back i will bet they extend him over summer. if they dont i think hes gone.

fowler: i see what you mean but the rams NEED pressure from that position. unless hes a total flop, i think the rams will do whatever they ned to do to keep him. if hes mediocre maybe you franchise him until he can find his replacement (like they did with tru and hoyner)

peters: i agree. he needs to earn it. even then you are probably are still hesitant to give him a long term deal given his "roughness around the edges"

talib. you might be right but we just signed weddle for 2 years. talib is younger.

blythe: he interesting. he has very high pff marks. as some observed during the draft. the rams ranking system seemed to align with those of pff. how much will he be valued? plus how much due they value continuity on the line?

higbee: he is also interesting. hes not great so he shouldnt cost a ton, plus how much does his relationship with godd factor in. also, there is the contunuity factor.




Quote
LMU93
Just my own view as of today:

Prioritize an extension:
Cory Littleton

Must earn a new deal (pay one):
Dante Fowler Jr.
Michael Brockers
Marcus Peters

Likely retiring:
Andrew Whitworth
Aqib Talib

Shouldn't be hard to re-sign:
Greg Zuerlein
Austin Blythe

Likely walking/moving on:
Troy Hill
Blake Bortles
Tyler Higbee
Marqui Christian
Mike Thomas
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  rams free agency 2020

PHDram857May 08, 2019 08:50AM

  Re: rams free agency 2020

Rams43282May 08, 2019 09:15AM

  Re: rams free agency 2020

SoCalRAMatic246May 08, 2019 09:31AM

  Brockers is still in his prime time....

roman18257May 08, 2019 10:40AM

  Re: Brockers is still in his prime time....

Rams43236May 08, 2019 10:54AM

  Re: Brockers is still in his prime time....

PHDram229May 08, 2019 11:04AM

  There's the point I make about Brockers....

roman18220May 08, 2019 11:47AM

  Brockers is the last remaining player from the RG3 trade

Rams Junkie166May 09, 2019 08:31AM

  Re: Brockers is still in his prime time....

zn221May 08, 2019 04:10PM

  Re: Brockers is still in his prime time....

PARAM200May 09, 2019 01:46AM

  Re: Brockers is still in his prime time....

zn348May 09, 2019 05:55AM

  I think they extend Goff

ferragamo79341May 08, 2019 09:40AM

  That doesn't have to impact 2020's cap

AlbaNY_Ram243May 08, 2019 10:15AM

  4 years for $147 million?

jemach222May 08, 2019 04:05PM

  Re: 4 years for $147 million?

AlbaNY_Ram214May 08, 2019 06:59PM

  Exactly

zn184May 09, 2019 11:15AM

  Re: 4 years for $147 million?

reggae234May 08, 2019 10:34PM

  overthecap.com shows the Rams with over $64M for 2020

AlbaNY_Ram239May 08, 2019 09:57AM

  hope they are right

PHDram212May 08, 2019 10:33AM

  Here's the problem

AlbaNY_Ram271May 08, 2019 12:21PM

  Good work!

PHDram182May 09, 2019 03:56AM

  Re: rams free agency 2020

GroundPounder233May 08, 2019 10:20AM

  Re: rams free agency 2020

Classicalwit199May 08, 2019 11:28AM

  Re: rams free agency 2020

zn256May 08, 2019 12:52PM

  but is it true?

CeeZar223May 08, 2019 04:18PM

  Re: but is it true?

zn218May 08, 2019 05:53PM

  The referenced article debunks the myth

CeeZar265May 09, 2019 04:19AM

  no

zn188May 09, 2019 05:48AM

  Re: The referenced article debunks the myth

PHDram178May 09, 2019 05:48AM

  Re: The referenced article debunks the myth

zn180May 09, 2019 05:58AM

  Re: The referenced article debunks the myth

CeeZar213May 09, 2019 06:27AM

  sure there is

PHDram210May 09, 2019 07:10AM

  Re: sure there is

CeeZar212May 09, 2019 07:55AM

  well there is evidence

PHDram172May 09, 2019 08:25AM

  Re: well there is evidence

CeeZar303May 09, 2019 10:02AM

  Excel, access to the internet, and too much time

PHDram172May 09, 2019 10:23AM

  uh oh...they are at 58 now

PHDram170May 09, 2019 09:15AM

  breaking this down, it's not very daunting

LMU93213May 09, 2019 05:24AM

  Sounds about right

BC Ramsfan224May 09, 2019 07:13AM

  i dont agree with alot of this tbh

PHDram257May 09, 2019 07:43AM