You mean where he dropped back, saw the play the whole way, set in a clean pocket, and had a chance to lead the receiver? And the receiver had room to run under it? The back of the endzone not being an issue? And there was no DB suddenly out of nowhere breaking into the play?
You think that;s a similar situation? (Oh and that's not a laser. It's a typical arc for a long ball the WR has a chance to run under because the timing was perfect on that one--because it was designed that way.)
I give Goff a lot of credit for even seeing the play from the Patz game and when he did, recognizing there was a broken coverage, Cooks did not have a whole lot of field to run under a long arc like that. By the the time he's visible on broken coverage he's way past the point of running under an arc and the entire thing requires a whole different set of parameters
Forget it my friend. We see this just completely differently.
And as everyone else has said, time to move on.
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 02/09/2019 11:23PM by zn.
