March 11, 2018 07:43AM
Quote


I'm a big fan of stretching the field and not having a unit suffer from vertical congestion, so IMO, a deep threat is needed. Bigger body is nice too, but they have that in Reynolds 6'3 & Mike Thomas 6'1, Richardson's speed, plus his ability to make the tough catch in traffic, seems like a good fit to the unit.
Do you think the bigger archetype receiver wouldn't fit this offence? .
As an example look at the big guy Philly has at WR .
They make it happen.

I think we run a compatible O .
I even think Woods could stretch the field vertically and some others could benefit from his clear outs.
Some of those bigger guys are open when they're not open.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Plan B: Paul Richardson?

RamBill1138March 10, 2018 01:16PM

  Watkins a much better player IMO

Speedball89310March 10, 2018 07:13PM

  Re: Plan B: Marquise Lee?

The_Zone347March 10, 2018 07:18PM

  Re: Plan B: Marquise Lee?

oldschoolramfan329March 10, 2018 07:40PM

  Re: Plan B: Marquise Lee?

reggae348March 10, 2018 08:20PM

  Re: Plan B: Marquise Lee?

CraigMatson434March 11, 2018 04:27AM

  Re: FA M. Lee

leafnose253March 11, 2018 10:47AM

  Re: Plan B: Marquise Lee?

Los Angeles Lenny235March 13, 2018 10:11AM

  Interesting how Watkins has been put on a pedestal

RockRam440March 11, 2018 04:22AM

  Re: Interesting how Watkins has been put on a pedestal

CraigMatson256March 11, 2018 04:43AM

  Re: Plan B: Paul Richardson?

den-the-coach270March 11, 2018 05:06AM

  Re: Plan B: Paul Richardson?

CraigMatson228March 11, 2018 05:32AM

  Re: Plan B: Paul Richardson?

den-the-coach226March 11, 2018 06:26AM

  Re: Plan B: Paul Richardson?

CraigMatson210March 11, 2018 07:43AM

  Re: Plan B: Paul Richardson?

den-the-coach239March 11, 2018 07:47AM

  Re: Interesting how Watkins has been put on a pedestal

Classicalwit330March 11, 2018 12:36PM

  the problem is relying exclusively on "production" for an argument

zn254March 11, 2018 05:35AM

  Re: Based on this Rams know what to pay and that’s why he didn’t sign before free agency

hammer322March 11, 2018 06:22AM

  Re: Based on this Rams know what to pay and that’s why he didn’t sign before free agency

zn280March 11, 2018 06:55AM

  Re: pure speculation and i think it's wrong...

spagsbacker282March 11, 2018 07:02AM

  it's not speculation at all

zn271March 11, 2018 07:21AM

  Re: Define Speculation

spagsbacker264March 11, 2018 09:49AM

  +1

Speedball89202March 11, 2018 10:16AM

  nope

zn286March 11, 2018 10:36AM

  Re: i get it, you disagree, but you're still wrong

spagsbacker250March 11, 2018 10:55AM

  same to ya my friend

zn261March 11, 2018 11:03AM

  Re: thank you...

spagsbacker254March 11, 2018 11:55AM

  naw

zn445March 11, 2018 03:47PM

  Re: Based on this Rams know what to pay and that’s why he didn’t sign before free agency

SoCalRAMatic259March 11, 2018 07:11AM

  Re: Based on this Rams know what to pay and that’s why he didn’t sign before free agency

zn372March 11, 2018 07:27AM

  Re: Based on this Rams know what to pay and that’s why he didn’t sign before free agency

badgerdms208March 13, 2018 08:28AM

  Re: the problem is relying exclusively on "production" for an argument

badgerdms202March 13, 2018 08:17AM

  False Attachments

Blue and Gold272March 11, 2018 10:42AM

  Quick slants

PeoriaRa228March 12, 2018 11:43AM

  Watch the film on them Attachments

Blue and Gold244March 12, 2018 11:47AM

  Re: oh man, that hurts

leafnose237March 13, 2018 07:54AM

  It is up to Reynolds, IMO

Blue and Gold190March 13, 2018 09:59AM

  I'd like Richardson at 7-8 million

Ram_Ruler228March 11, 2018 05:56AM

  My evaluation...

jemach273March 11, 2018 10:24AM

  I had to look up who he was

ferragamo79249March 11, 2018 10:26AM

  Re: Plan B: Paul Richardson?

Classicalwit238March 11, 2018 12:38PM

  I don't think he'd beat out Josh Reynolds.

alyoshamucci360March 11, 2018 12:39PM

  Richardson film

Speed_Kills220March 13, 2018 08:03AM

  Re: Richardson film

Ramkind220March 13, 2018 08:14AM

  Re: Richardson film

Hollywood Ram203March 13, 2018 08:17AM