Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Based on this Rams know what to pay and that’s why he didn’t sign before free agency

March 11, 2018 06:55AM
Quote
hammer
I agree Woods was a great find by Mcvay, The Rams evaluated Woods and saw a player that fit the scheme, and even though the statistics weren't there, they signed him. Those same evaluators have had a close look at Watkins over this last year in their system. They know what he can do, know his ceiling and what he added to that offense. I’m confident they know his true value to the TEAM. At this point we know the Rams didn’t offer Waklins enough. Watkins and his agent belive he’s worth more. Certainly he was a high draft pick, but his career stastics are not that and I have heard all kinds of excuses why. He’s been in the league four years so some weight must be given to them. Based on the Woods find (as well as Kupp) I know the Rams evaluations of talent look at much more than draft position and stastics. Agents and egos are never that objective. If someone over pays he’ll sign ( I would too). I believe some team will and he’s already gone. But I also believe that the McVay regime has evaluated the talent on the team, the receivers they can acquire by draft, free agency or trade and that was factored into the offer. Replacement cost is known. Personally I’d like him back, he’s solid and a known quality. We all fear the unknown, but if not I trust McVay in filling the opening.

I agree with a lot of that but McVay had too much to do as a new coach to be the one who "found" Woods. That was Snead.

The problem with paying Watkins is that the Rams have Donald, Joyner, the draft picks, Talib, and a host of lesser UFAs, RFAs, and ERFAs to pay. So lowballing Watkins is just inevitable. There are other teams with busy pro evaluators too, just like the Rams, and one or more of them who will pay more for SW in this market because they can both afford to and because they see that that is his actual value.





...



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 03/11/2018 06:56AM by zn.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Plan B: Paul Richardson?

RamBill1130March 10, 2018 01:16PM

  Watkins a much better player IMO

Speedball89309March 10, 2018 07:13PM

  Re: Plan B: Marquise Lee?

The_Zone344March 10, 2018 07:18PM

  Re: Plan B: Marquise Lee?

oldschoolramfan327March 10, 2018 07:40PM

  Re: Plan B: Marquise Lee?

reggae345March 10, 2018 08:20PM

  Re: Plan B: Marquise Lee?

CraigMatson429March 11, 2018 04:27AM

  Re: FA M. Lee

leafnose252March 11, 2018 10:47AM

  Re: Plan B: Marquise Lee?

Los Angeles Lenny233March 13, 2018 10:11AM

  Interesting how Watkins has been put on a pedestal

RockRam439March 11, 2018 04:22AM

  Re: Interesting how Watkins has been put on a pedestal

CraigMatson255March 11, 2018 04:43AM

  Re: Plan B: Paul Richardson?

den-the-coach269March 11, 2018 05:06AM

  Re: Plan B: Paul Richardson?

CraigMatson226March 11, 2018 05:32AM

  Re: Plan B: Paul Richardson?

den-the-coach223March 11, 2018 06:26AM

  Re: Plan B: Paul Richardson?

CraigMatson209March 11, 2018 07:43AM

  Re: Plan B: Paul Richardson?

den-the-coach238March 11, 2018 07:47AM

  Re: Interesting how Watkins has been put on a pedestal

Classicalwit326March 11, 2018 12:36PM

  the problem is relying exclusively on "production" for an argument

zn252March 11, 2018 05:35AM

  Re: Based on this Rams know what to pay and that’s why he didn’t sign before free agency

hammer320March 11, 2018 06:22AM

  Re: Based on this Rams know what to pay and that’s why he didn’t sign before free agency

zn279March 11, 2018 06:55AM

  Re: pure speculation and i think it's wrong...

spagsbacker279March 11, 2018 07:02AM

  it's not speculation at all

zn270March 11, 2018 07:21AM

  Re: Define Speculation

spagsbacker259March 11, 2018 09:49AM

  +1

Speedball89201March 11, 2018 10:16AM

  nope

zn284March 11, 2018 10:36AM

  Re: i get it, you disagree, but you're still wrong

spagsbacker248March 11, 2018 10:55AM

  same to ya my friend

zn260March 11, 2018 11:03AM

  Re: thank you...

spagsbacker252March 11, 2018 11:55AM

  naw

zn444March 11, 2018 03:47PM

  Re: Based on this Rams know what to pay and that’s why he didn’t sign before free agency

SoCalRAMatic257March 11, 2018 07:11AM

  Re: Based on this Rams know what to pay and that’s why he didn’t sign before free agency

zn371March 11, 2018 07:27AM

  Re: Based on this Rams know what to pay and that’s why he didn’t sign before free agency

badgerdms204March 13, 2018 08:28AM

  Re: the problem is relying exclusively on "production" for an argument

badgerdms200March 13, 2018 08:17AM

  False Attachments

Blue and Gold271March 11, 2018 10:42AM

  Quick slants

PeoriaRa227March 12, 2018 11:43AM

  Watch the film on them Attachments

Blue and Gold243March 12, 2018 11:47AM

  Re: oh man, that hurts

leafnose236March 13, 2018 07:54AM

  It is up to Reynolds, IMO

Blue and Gold188March 13, 2018 09:59AM

  I'd like Richardson at 7-8 million

Ram_Ruler226March 11, 2018 05:56AM

  My evaluation...

jemach272March 11, 2018 10:24AM

  I had to look up who he was

ferragamo79247March 11, 2018 10:26AM

  Re: Plan B: Paul Richardson?

Classicalwit237March 11, 2018 12:38PM

  I don't think he'd beat out Josh Reynolds.

alyoshamucci358March 11, 2018 12:39PM

  Richardson film

Speed_Kills219March 13, 2018 08:03AM

  Re: Richardson film

Ramkind217March 13, 2018 08:14AM

  Re: Richardson film

Hollywood Ram201March 13, 2018 08:17AM