March 11, 2018 07:21AM
Quote
spagsbacker
I believe McVay had his eye on Woods and Whitworth all along, and was part of his sales pitch/plan when interviewing for coaching job. Snead is good at bold trades, but i do not trust his player evaluation, never will.

They didn't hire a 31 year old first time head coach and expect him to be a personnel guru. That would be foolish on the Rams part.

And it's not speculation---these guys are endlessly transparent about their personnel processes. This comes through in all sorts of detail in all sorts of sources, friom articles to interviews and press conferences with all the major people (Demoff, Snead, McVay). The paper trail on Rams personnel processes is long, deep, rich, and detailed.

Given all that info, no, the head coach is not walking around being the team personnel guru. Either way he had enough to do as it is being a first time head coach preparing for a draft and installing a new offensive system, something he didn't even assign to a coordinator.

McVay relies heavily on Snead for personnel input. Beyond that, what kind of GM WOULDN'T know about Woods and Whitworth?

This is the Rams process, and it's not speculation to say this, it's just knowing the abundant info that is out there. Snead consults closely to see what his coaches like and need to fit their systems. Coaches of course know what they like and need, but as Snead once said, coaches scout one month a year and personnel people scout 12 months a year. If coaches in a system like that don't listen to their personnel guys they are just being negligent. So McVay says, we need this and the player should have these specs, and Snead goes well we have info on hundreds of guys and here are some choices that fit. It's collaborative.

Snead's player evaluation is very good, otherwise they would not have been a winning team last year. If you look around the league over the years, invariably, teams that accomplish 1-year turnarounds do so BOTH because they make a good coaching hire AND because they have a big collection of good inherited talent. You don't have a big collection of good inherited talent if your GM and personnel people are not any good.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Plan B: Paul Richardson?

RamBill1139March 10, 2018 01:16PM

  Watkins a much better player IMO

Speedball89311March 10, 2018 07:13PM

  Re: Plan B: Marquise Lee?

The_Zone347March 10, 2018 07:18PM

  Re: Plan B: Marquise Lee?

oldschoolramfan329March 10, 2018 07:40PM

  Re: Plan B: Marquise Lee?

reggae348March 10, 2018 08:20PM

  Re: Plan B: Marquise Lee?

CraigMatson435March 11, 2018 04:27AM

  Re: FA M. Lee

leafnose254March 11, 2018 10:47AM

  Re: Plan B: Marquise Lee?

Los Angeles Lenny235March 13, 2018 10:11AM

  Interesting how Watkins has been put on a pedestal

RockRam441March 11, 2018 04:22AM

  Re: Interesting how Watkins has been put on a pedestal

CraigMatson258March 11, 2018 04:43AM

  Re: Plan B: Paul Richardson?

den-the-coach270March 11, 2018 05:06AM

  Re: Plan B: Paul Richardson?

CraigMatson229March 11, 2018 05:32AM

  Re: Plan B: Paul Richardson?

den-the-coach226March 11, 2018 06:26AM

  Re: Plan B: Paul Richardson?

CraigMatson211March 11, 2018 07:43AM

  Re: Plan B: Paul Richardson?

den-the-coach239March 11, 2018 07:47AM

  Re: Interesting how Watkins has been put on a pedestal

Classicalwit330March 11, 2018 12:36PM

  the problem is relying exclusively on "production" for an argument

zn255March 11, 2018 05:35AM

  Re: Based on this Rams know what to pay and that’s why he didn’t sign before free agency

hammer323March 11, 2018 06:22AM

  Re: Based on this Rams know what to pay and that’s why he didn’t sign before free agency

zn281March 11, 2018 06:55AM

  Re: pure speculation and i think it's wrong...

spagsbacker282March 11, 2018 07:02AM

  it's not speculation at all

zn271March 11, 2018 07:21AM

  Re: Define Speculation

spagsbacker264March 11, 2018 09:49AM

  +1

Speedball89203March 11, 2018 10:16AM

  nope

zn287March 11, 2018 10:36AM

  Re: i get it, you disagree, but you're still wrong

spagsbacker250March 11, 2018 10:55AM

  same to ya my friend

zn262March 11, 2018 11:03AM

  Re: thank you...

spagsbacker254March 11, 2018 11:55AM

  naw

zn446March 11, 2018 03:47PM

  Re: Based on this Rams know what to pay and that’s why he didn’t sign before free agency

SoCalRAMatic259March 11, 2018 07:11AM

  Re: Based on this Rams know what to pay and that’s why he didn’t sign before free agency

zn373March 11, 2018 07:27AM

  Re: Based on this Rams know what to pay and that’s why he didn’t sign before free agency

badgerdms208March 13, 2018 08:28AM

  Re: the problem is relying exclusively on "production" for an argument

badgerdms203March 13, 2018 08:17AM

  False Attachments

Blue and Gold273March 11, 2018 10:42AM

  Quick slants

PeoriaRa229March 12, 2018 11:43AM

  Watch the film on them Attachments

Blue and Gold244March 12, 2018 11:47AM

  Re: oh man, that hurts

leafnose237March 13, 2018 07:54AM

  It is up to Reynolds, IMO

Blue and Gold190March 13, 2018 09:59AM

  I'd like Richardson at 7-8 million

Ram_Ruler229March 11, 2018 05:56AM

  My evaluation...

jemach274March 11, 2018 10:24AM

  I had to look up who he was

ferragamo79249March 11, 2018 10:26AM

  Re: Plan B: Paul Richardson?

Classicalwit238March 11, 2018 12:38PM

  I don't think he'd beat out Josh Reynolds.

alyoshamucci360March 11, 2018 12:39PM

  Richardson film

Speed_Kills220March 13, 2018 08:03AM

  Re: Richardson film

Ramkind220March 13, 2018 08:14AM

  Re: Richardson film

Hollywood Ram203March 13, 2018 08:17AM