March 03, 2018 02:01PM | Registered: 14 years ago Posts: 15,672 Status: HOF Inductee |
Quote
dzrams
Quote
laram
Quote
dzrams
Quote
Rams43
Exactly, dz.
Last year they got good production and good results from such as Webster, NRC, and Barwin.
Nary a top tier FA among them.
Why couldn’t they do something similar this year at CB, NT, ILB, or OLB?
Then they could let the draft come to them taking BPA at need positions.
Sure makes sense to me.
Exactly.
I expect to see some 2nd tier signings just like last year.
I feel that Snead likes to head into the draft with having no acute needs.
They ended up middle of the pact on defense with TruJo and Quinn on defense and an offense that forced teams out of their comfort zones.
Webster was forced into the starting role and actually played like a backup.
So lets assume with a year of tape the offense is not quite as prolific as last season and the Rams need more from the defense.
I think that's a logical assumption.
Anyway the Rams are gonna need some playmakers other than Donald and Peters.
Not just Red Players and looking around I see a bunch of them.
I see your point. And agree that the defense could really use more playmakers besides Donald and Peters.
But I have a few counterpoints....
First is the assumption won't be quite as prolific as last season. (Let's assume Watkins is back b/c if he's not I'm really mad.)
While it's logical to assume that a year of tape could negatively affect the offense, I think that could be more than offset by improvements in Goff and McVay. They are both young and just perfecting their craft.
It's just as logical to me to assume that they both get better especially since, in the case of Goff, we saw him take a major step up in year 2 from year 1.
So overall, if there were no changes on O, I expect it to be better.
On D, it arguably had only Donald as a playmaker last season. AD was the engine that made the D go.
Quinn came on strong in week 10 but before that, he wasn't playmaking.
TruJ wasn't a playmaker at all last year so if Peters does what he typically does, the D already has an extra playmaker versus last year.
At best, the D had 2 playmakers last year from week 10 on.
Even without the addition of another playmaker, they will have two in AD and Peters which matches the amount they had for a small portion of the year.
BTW, I see Joyner as a playmaker.
All that said, I'd love to see them add another playmaker on D. I think they have the funds to do so if they want to.