Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: I expect at least, 2, probably more, FAs to start on D this year

March 03, 2018 08:15AM
Quote
zn
Quote
dzrams
Quote
zn
Quote
dzrams
I agree there will be a FA pick up at OLB. It most likely will be Barwin to another one year deal.

It was telling to me when McVay mentioned him by name the other day as to who were the strong leaders in the locker room that made them feel comfortable trading for Peters. I'm not that excited about Barwin but I think that's the way the Rams are leaning.

I'd also watch Trent Murphy from Washington. McVay is familiar with him and he was good rushing the passer prior to his injury. A short term prove it contract will likely work for him.

I don't know that Rams see ILB as a need. We'll have to see what they do with Barron. If he isn't cut, that indicates they have no interest in an ILB.

I doubt they can afford 2 namebrand outside FAs.

Even with Quinn gone.

Not if they are going to sign the Big 3.

....

Do you see Trent Murphy or Barwin as namebrand FA signings?

Barwin isn't, which struck me as obvious and "goes without saying"-ish.

But I wasn't commenting on your statements or claims. Just jumping in.

Did you make the mistake of thinking I was arguing specifically with what you said as opposed to what I really did, which was just to dive into the topic with my own 2 cents? cool smiley

Just chatting.

I count Barwin among their own potential lower tier re-signings, which includes UFAs and ERFAs and RFAs like Longacre and Sullivan etc.

Murphy is an interesting prospect though...I doubt he would be a top name tier FA, it looks like he would be more like Barwin was last year. 3-4 M area. The thing about Murphy is, he played for Joe Barry last year.

....

...

...

I did think you were responding to my claims which is why I was incredulous that Barwin would be in the namebrand list.

But I see you weren't arguing with me. My mistake.

I see Murphy in the same range you do.

Since we're chatting, I do think they can sign at least one namebrand free agent. How many they can sign depends on what dollar amount is considered namebrand.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  I expect at least, 2, probably more, FAs to start on D this year

RockRam623March 03, 2018 03:36AM

  I agree in principle

max210March 03, 2018 03:53AM

  I am not sure Wade is concerned with run D

LMU93218March 03, 2018 04:08AM

  After the Atl game, he'd better be

Old Goat196March 03, 2018 06:33AM

  It was the second half...

jemach195March 03, 2018 06:39AM

  Re: Delete...NM

laram171March 03, 2018 07:12AM

  Re: It was the second half...

Old Goat209March 03, 2018 07:47AM

  Re: I expect at least, 2, probably more, FAs to start on D this year

Rams43189March 03, 2018 07:10AM

  Re: I expect at least, 2, probably more, FAs to start on D this year

dzrams189March 03, 2018 07:27AM

  Re: I expect at least, 2, probably more, FAs to start on D this year

zn179March 03, 2018 07:37AM

  Re: I expect at least, 2, probably more, FAs to start on D this year

dzrams175March 03, 2018 07:41AM

  Re: I expect at least, 2, probably more, FAs to start on D this year

zn173March 03, 2018 07:52AM

  Re: I expect at least, 2, probably more, FAs to start on D this year

dzrams197March 03, 2018 08:15AM

  Re: I expect at least, 2, probably more, FAs to start on D this year

zn215March 03, 2018 08:49AM

  Re: I expect at least, 2, probably more, FAs to start on D this year

Rams43184March 03, 2018 07:56AM

  Re: I expect at least, 2, probably more, FAs to start on D this year

dzrams168March 03, 2018 08:17AM

  Re: I expect at least, 2, probably more, FAs to start on D this year

oldschoolramfan148March 03, 2018 08:33AM

  Re: I expect at least, 2, probably more, FAs to start on D this year

dzrams154March 03, 2018 08:42AM

  Re: That ain't gonna work IMO...

laram173March 03, 2018 09:15AM

  Re: That ain't gonna work IMO...

dzrams178March 03, 2018 01:16PM

  Re: Good retort with a couple caveats..

laram169March 03, 2018 02:01PM

  Re: Good caveats..

dzrams165March 03, 2018 02:33PM