If it were my opinion that last year's Fisher Rams were a better team than McVay's Rams, that is a mere opinion as well.
But
would it be an equally reasonable opinion that this year's Rams are completely new team that has improved immensely over any Rams team in the last decade, especially last year's Fisher-led Rams?
Not all opinions are created equal. The first is supported by mere fancy, but the 2nd is supported by facts.
Perhaps the posters are somewhat aghast at your position because they hold to the belief that the longer the facts insist on countermanding a particular opinion, the less persuasive and lower-value that opinion becomes.
