Quote
roman18
thus far vs. your idea that Shanny is a good coach with a 0-9 record.........I am looking at proof....you are going on belief.....If he started a team with no players why did he not go and get some of the FA's we went after and got? He must have thought what??? He had his O-Line right? He had his WR's? You say McVay had a lot of built in players but we have an all new WR group, new TE's A new defense with needed new position players, and a new O-line as well.....to me that looks like a newly remodeled team. yes we have some hold overs as does Shanny.....but who has better used them?
You have no dog in the fight....your premise is based on idea only.....belief only.......my talk is about proof.....I still think that proof trumps idea.....how can you state that if you have proof you have no idea either way? If I have proof I don't need to go to having an idea....an idea is just a supposition....there is no proof in that....
The way you need to state your point is....I think that Shanny may be a good HC because I think he will be.....I am saying McVay is a good HC because he is.....
I don't know why this is dragging out.
I said no one has proof either way of whether Shanahan will be seen as a very good coach once he has a team to coach. I said in my opinion though, he would be that.
It ends there my friend. I declared an opinion, you declared yours, you directly admit there's no proof either way, which means all we have here is contrasting opinions.
At that point there's nothing to add. We just agree to disagree.
Or I do anyway. If you want to post on on this, be my guest.
,,,
