Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Strongly disagree with this author...

July 17, 2017 07:21AM
For one thing, Thomas was reportedly impressing in OTA's and mini-camp.

For another, an outside deep threat is just what McVay wants and needs in his new O. Thomas can fill that role, perhaps.

And lastly, what's the harm of watching Thomas throughout camp and preseason before cutting the cord?

This could still work out very well for all parties. Not giving him a chance seems senseless to me.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Rams shouldn't waste time, should part ways with WR Michael Thomas...

Rams43740July 17, 2017 07:03AM

  Re: Rams shouldn't waste time, should part ways with WR Michael Thomas...

zn314July 17, 2017 07:14AM

  Strongly disagree with this author...

Rams43302July 17, 2017 07:21AM

  Agreed

GreatRamNTheSky211July 17, 2017 09:33AM

  Re: Rams sure seem to have more than their share of dopers..

laram255July 17, 2017 07:49AM

  Choir boys compared to Cowboys.....

Rampage2K-242July 17, 2017 08:35AM

  Why keep him?

FootballGenius341July 17, 2017 08:07AM

  Agree this is a 'me not we' guy

promomasterj259July 17, 2017 08:26AM

  Re: Why keep him?

zn277July 17, 2017 09:54AM

  Re: Why keep him?

FootballGenius201July 17, 2017 10:57AM

  Re: Why keep him?

zn249July 17, 2017 01:23PM

  Re: Why keep him?

FootballGenius226July 17, 2017 05:12PM

  Re: Why keep him?

zn236July 17, 2017 05:46PM

  There was a day......

NewMexicoRam268July 17, 2017 02:35PM

  Re: There was a day......

zn285July 17, 2017 02:59PM

  I believe in second chances, not third ones, and I think McVay will too

rambleon281July 17, 2017 10:07AM

  No reason to cut him

reggae297July 17, 2017 05:10PM

  Re: No reason to cut him

zn363July 17, 2017 10:17PM

  Huh? Cut a young WR that won't count against your 53?

Flipper336307July 18, 2017 02:15AM

  Re: Huh? Cut a young WR that won't count against your 53?

Ohiorams261July 18, 2017 03:51AM