Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Why keep him?

July 17, 2017 09:54AM
Quote
FootballGenius
Because he's a good gunner lol? He had 3 catches. Can u remember them? Me neither. But his dropped pass and fumble against Seattle, we remember that. It would be different if he put up some kind of numbers, but he didn't. Even on a team starved for WR help.

I am not basing my own view of Thomas on a 6th round pick;s rookie season on a struggling offense. All that tells me is that he got his rookie year out of the way. My own interest in Thomas is based on 3 things. One is, if you look at his draft profile, he got lot of buzz. For example, see what PFF says about him below. Second, he caught people's attention this spring as a guy who is clearly developing. Both Goff and McVay singled him out independently for good work and for stepping up. Third, he was already a very good special teams gunner.

So if he continues to ascend throughout camp, then, yeah, I am interested.

Here's PFF on him:

Quote

from PFF: Top 10 impact sleeper picks from the 2016 NFL draft

MAY 2, 2016

[www.profootballfocus.com]

3. MIKE THOMAS, WR, LOS ANGELES RAMS
Thomas likely fell in the draft due to average measurables and the fact that he played against a lower level of competition at Southern Miss. But he had the 11th highest receiving grade in this draft class, and flashed the kind of ability at times that leads you to believe he has a chance to develop into a very special player. His 2.98 yards per route run average was the fifth-best mark of any receiver in this draft class. His second-highest game grade of the year came against Washington in the bowl game, which should at least somewhat dampen fears about the level of competition he faced. He’s a potential steal for the Rams. . . ..




..



Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 07/17/2017 09:58AM by zn.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Rams shouldn't waste time, should part ways with WR Michael Thomas...

Rams43740July 17, 2017 07:03AM

  Re: Rams shouldn't waste time, should part ways with WR Michael Thomas...

zn313July 17, 2017 07:14AM

  Strongly disagree with this author...

Rams43302July 17, 2017 07:21AM

  Agreed

GreatRamNTheSky211July 17, 2017 09:33AM

  Re: Rams sure seem to have more than their share of dopers..

laram255July 17, 2017 07:49AM

  Choir boys compared to Cowboys.....

Rampage2K-241July 17, 2017 08:35AM

  Why keep him?

FootballGenius340July 17, 2017 08:07AM

  Agree this is a 'me not we' guy

promomasterj258July 17, 2017 08:26AM

  Re: Why keep him?

zn276July 17, 2017 09:54AM

  Re: Why keep him?

FootballGenius201July 17, 2017 10:57AM

  Re: Why keep him?

zn248July 17, 2017 01:23PM

  Re: Why keep him?

FootballGenius226July 17, 2017 05:12PM

  Re: Why keep him?

zn236July 17, 2017 05:46PM

  There was a day......

NewMexicoRam267July 17, 2017 02:35PM

  Re: There was a day......

zn285July 17, 2017 02:59PM

  I believe in second chances, not third ones, and I think McVay will too

rambleon281July 17, 2017 10:07AM

  No reason to cut him

reggae297July 17, 2017 05:10PM

  Re: No reason to cut him

zn363July 17, 2017 10:17PM

  Huh? Cut a young WR that won't count against your 53?

Flipper336307July 18, 2017 02:15AM

  Re: Huh? Cut a young WR that won't count against your 53?

Ohiorams260July 18, 2017 03:51AM