April 13, 2017 03:00AM
Kroenke had made the decision to move the team once he took control. Apparently St. Louis officials have details to substantiate that.

Kroenke then played the farce of an effort to have St. Louis keep the team, with St. Louis spending millions but all along already committed to moving.

BTW...I live Dallas and about a year ago, I ran into Pittsburgh management in town for league meetings. It was over cocktails. We discussed the Rams move. I remember what one of the guys said...the Rams were going to move once Kroenke took control. He said St. Louis never had a chance.

And he thought Kroenke was a turd...as well as the Cowboys Stephen Jones. In fact, he said Stephen Jones was the biggest arse in the league. It was kind of a fun discussion.

And for the poster pimping the St. Louis fans for not supporting the team...it's not good to embarrass yourself with complete lack of knowledge of facts.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  St. Louis Sues the NFL: 1 Billion

Ram491158April 12, 2017 10:31AM

  Re: St. Louis Sues the NFL: 1 Billion

Rams43446April 12, 2017 10:33AM

  And I'm guessing StL never wants a chance at another NFL team. (nm)

DaJudge407April 12, 2017 11:04AM

  They will have better luck with it than...

jemach351April 13, 2017 03:01AM

  Re: St. Louis Sues the NFL: 1 Billion

Rampage2K-554April 12, 2017 10:34AM

  Re: St. Louis Sues the NFL: 1 Billion

tclahammeer486April 12, 2017 11:56AM

  I guess St. Louis wants to lose even more money.

GreatRamNTheSky562April 12, 2017 12:12PM

  Re: I guess St. Louis wants to lose even more money.

OCRAM85454April 12, 2017 02:13PM

  Re: I guess St. Louis wants to lose even more money.

bigjimram21408April 12, 2017 06:36PM

  What SHOULD be paid to St Louis, if not already......

Ramgator517April 12, 2017 02:28PM

  You know RamGator, that would have been classy

ArizonaRamFan417April 12, 2017 03:11PM

  Business is not done that way

GreatRamNTheSky341April 12, 2017 10:35PM

  I have been self employed almost 15 years. it IS how business is done.

ArizonaRamFan266April 13, 2017 04:28AM

  Huh?

DaJudge361April 13, 2017 05:24AM

  I do not know law but here is where St Louis has point

Rams_81254April 13, 2017 06:03AM

  Useless to keep going round and round.

DaJudge381April 13, 2017 06:54AM

  Amen Brother! NM

GreatRamNTheSky321April 13, 2017 08:17AM

  Re: You were correct...

dzrams492April 13, 2017 10:00AM

  Correctomundo!

GreatRamNTheSky233April 13, 2017 08:16AM

  Fraud element is involved though

Rams_81336April 13, 2017 06:25AM

  Re: I have been self employed almost 15 years. it IS how business is done.

GreatRamNTheSky399April 13, 2017 08:14AM

  Again see Fraud link

Rams_81291April 13, 2017 09:10AM

  This will be problematic

LesBaker334April 12, 2017 02:46PM

  Re: This will be problematic

RamsFanSinceLA389April 12, 2017 02:49PM

  Re: This will be problematic

GreatRamNTheSky281April 12, 2017 10:47PM

  The NFL than needs to abandon relocation guidelines

Rams_81511April 13, 2017 06:15AM

  Re: This will be problematic

RamsFanSinceLA262April 13, 2017 07:04AM

  I think...

jemach293April 13, 2017 04:19AM

  Lawyers never see anything in black and white because there is no money in it!

RamBum352April 13, 2017 07:32AM

  The suit has no legs and will lose badly

GreatRamNTheSky276April 12, 2017 10:45PM

  Another reason why suit may have legs...

jemach282April 13, 2017 03:00AM

  All speculation and opinion and not admisable in Court

GreatRamNTheSky306April 13, 2017 08:09AM

  Re: Another reason why suit may have legs...

David Deacon338April 13, 2017 08:56AM

  In the end St. Louis had the stadium deal in place

Rams_81305April 13, 2017 09:12AM

  You know, this lawsuit might have had legs, except...

ArizonaRamFan400April 12, 2017 03:00PM

  St Louis = Breach of Contract.

Old Goat327April 12, 2017 03:48PM

  I have a different theory

PeoriaRa658April 13, 2017 08:53AM

  Re: I have a different theory

waterfield307April 13, 2017 09:56AM

  Re: That theory is problematic...

dzrams286April 13, 2017 10:04AM