Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Business is not done that way

April 12, 2017 10:35PM
Quote
ArizonaRamFan
It would have been classy for the NFL to reimburse whatever it was, 6 million or so? [edit-Les said it was around 20 million?) of the city's money for putting together all those plans and doing the legwork to secure all those lots that were going to be combined for the stadium.

It could have come from just a tiny, tiny slice of the YUUUUGE windfall relo fee of 1.1 billion paid out to the NFL by the Rams and the Chargers ($550,000,000 has to be the largest "fee" in history!) and would have mended some fences and probably headed off this lawsuit in the first place.

But... the NFL was not obligated to pay back a dime, so they didn't, and here we are.

I do bids for a living. There is always a clause in every Bid request that states the requester is not responsible or liable for the costs the bidder accumulated in putting their proposal together.

The NFL owes St. Louis nothing.

Grits



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/12/2017 10:48PM by GreatRamNTheSky.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  St. Louis Sues the NFL: 1 Billion

Ram491158April 12, 2017 10:31AM

  Re: St. Louis Sues the NFL: 1 Billion

Rams43445April 12, 2017 10:33AM

  And I'm guessing StL never wants a chance at another NFL team. (nm)

DaJudge406April 12, 2017 11:04AM

  They will have better luck with it than...

jemach351April 13, 2017 03:01AM

  Re: St. Louis Sues the NFL: 1 Billion

Rampage2K-553April 12, 2017 10:34AM

  Re: St. Louis Sues the NFL: 1 Billion

tclahammeer485April 12, 2017 11:56AM

  I guess St. Louis wants to lose even more money.

GreatRamNTheSky561April 12, 2017 12:12PM

  Re: I guess St. Louis wants to lose even more money.

OCRAM85454April 12, 2017 02:13PM

  Re: I guess St. Louis wants to lose even more money.

bigjimram21407April 12, 2017 06:36PM

  What SHOULD be paid to St Louis, if not already......

Ramgator516April 12, 2017 02:28PM

  You know RamGator, that would have been classy

ArizonaRamFan416April 12, 2017 03:11PM

  Business is not done that way

GreatRamNTheSky340April 12, 2017 10:35PM

  I have been self employed almost 15 years. it IS how business is done.

ArizonaRamFan265April 13, 2017 04:28AM

  Huh?

DaJudge360April 13, 2017 05:24AM

  I do not know law but here is where St Louis has point

Rams_81253April 13, 2017 06:03AM

  Useless to keep going round and round.

DaJudge380April 13, 2017 06:54AM

  Amen Brother! NM

GreatRamNTheSky321April 13, 2017 08:17AM

  Re: You were correct...

dzrams491April 13, 2017 10:00AM

  Correctomundo!

GreatRamNTheSky232April 13, 2017 08:16AM

  Fraud element is involved though

Rams_81336April 13, 2017 06:25AM

  Re: I have been self employed almost 15 years. it IS how business is done.

GreatRamNTheSky399April 13, 2017 08:14AM

  Again see Fraud link

Rams_81290April 13, 2017 09:10AM

  This will be problematic

LesBaker333April 12, 2017 02:46PM

  Re: This will be problematic

RamsFanSinceLA388April 12, 2017 02:49PM

  Re: This will be problematic

GreatRamNTheSky280April 12, 2017 10:47PM

  The NFL than needs to abandon relocation guidelines

Rams_81511April 13, 2017 06:15AM

  Re: This will be problematic

RamsFanSinceLA262April 13, 2017 07:04AM

  I think...

jemach293April 13, 2017 04:19AM

  Lawyers never see anything in black and white because there is no money in it!

RamBum352April 13, 2017 07:32AM

  The suit has no legs and will lose badly

GreatRamNTheSky276April 12, 2017 10:45PM

  Another reason why suit may have legs...

jemach281April 13, 2017 03:00AM

  All speculation and opinion and not admisable in Court

GreatRamNTheSky306April 13, 2017 08:09AM

  Re: Another reason why suit may have legs...

David Deacon337April 13, 2017 08:56AM

  In the end St. Louis had the stadium deal in place

Rams_81305April 13, 2017 09:12AM

  You know, this lawsuit might have had legs, except...

ArizonaRamFan400April 12, 2017 03:00PM

  St Louis = Breach of Contract.

Old Goat326April 12, 2017 03:48PM

  I have a different theory

PeoriaRa658April 13, 2017 08:53AM

  Re: I have a different theory

waterfield306April 13, 2017 09:56AM

  Re: That theory is problematic...

dzrams286April 13, 2017 10:04AM