Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: If his job is in question, why is Snead involved in selecting the new HC?

January 07, 2017 06:45AM
That Tavon thing is a 2 parter, isn't it?

1) The trade up and pick itself. I considered it a bold move at the time. Marginally favored it over the safer path of keeping the original picks. I foolishly assumed that Fisher's O staff could and would turn Tavon into a feared weapon.

2) The extension. This one was unforgivable. I STILL can't rationalize this one. An example of the type of decisions that have made the Rams a league laughingstock. I have a hard time tagging Snead with that one, though, since he's still on the job. And Fisher isn't.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  If his job is in question, why is Snead involved in selecting the new HC?

RamBum691January 07, 2017 05:01AM

  Maybe his job isn't in question

NewMexicoRam316January 07, 2017 06:07AM

  Or

zn324January 07, 2017 06:13AM

  Re: Or

bigjimram21320January 07, 2017 06:29AM

  Re: Or

zn372January 07, 2017 06:41AM

  Re: If his job is in question, why is Snead involved in selecting the new HC?

Bud Frosty414January 07, 2017 06:30AM

  Its discouraging to me...

max418January 07, 2017 06:38AM

  Re: Its discouraging to me...

Rams43349January 07, 2017 07:01AM

  Re: If his job is in question, why is Snead involved in selecting the new HC?

Rams43361January 07, 2017 06:45AM

  If his job is in question, why is Snead involved? Good Question!

Anonymous User472January 07, 2017 07:33AM

  Re: If his job is in question, why is Snead involved? Good Question!

Rams43388January 07, 2017 07:49AM