you said you had him #1, then you said he might be a bust before he ever threw an nfl pass in a regular season game.
you also proclaim yourself a good evaluator but then give him a ceiling of manning and a floor of couch. no offense but anybody can offer that range and claim they were correct no matter the outcome.
finally after 3 games...you say he is what he is. most the the nfl scouts and personnell people i read not the fact that rookies tend to get better over time so why make such a declaration after 3 games?
my personal opinion is that youre playing both sides of the goff debate but whatever. its all good. ive enjoyed your provocative posts.
