Quote
wv ram
Quote
Saguaro
What we have here now is a situation where the obvious long-term starter for this team, the player they hope is their franchise QB, can't be inserted into the lineup because they've won a few games with the backup, who very likely won't even be here next year.
I don't care how you look at it, that's screwed up. And maybe it's Goff's fault, and maybe it's Fisher's fault, or his staff's fault, or maybe it's nobody's fault. But I don't think it's good.
IMO, it sucks.
That surprises me, that you think this is a bad situation.
My view is different. I just dont see any downside to this at all. I got zero qualms or problems with Goff sitting for a short time, or a long time -- as long as Case is winning with his ugly efficient style.
I just dont see this as 'wasted time' for Mr Goff. I think he's learning plenty of important things on the sidelines and meanwhile the Rams are winning.
I dont want him in there now botching snaps and tossing INTs and watching the Rams lose games. I just dont care when he plays. I trust the coaches to know when Goff gives them a better chance to win than Case.
w
v
.... we obviously think/hope Goff's ceiling is (much) higher than CK, and therefore that the Rams' ceiling with Goff is higher than with Keenum taking the snaps. And while I agree that Goff can learn a lot on the sidelines, some of his learning can only happen on the field. So unless CK suddenly starts looking like a very good QB, and not simply a QB doing just enough to not hold the team back, I do want to see Goff in there by the start of next season for sure, preferably before (and definitely earlier if Rams starts losing under CK).
