Quote
Suh-weet!
Using the results of two plays to make an argument about whether QB A is better than QB B, or vice versa, is silliness.
and being able to pull something from his memory bank in real-time. And it is one illustration among many that is
clear and concise.
If you want to disagree, that's fine. If you want to think Goff is as good or better than Stafford, that's up to you. If you think
the trade for Stafford as a bad idea---if that is what you think, by all means.
But when someone who is not a Rams fan, who consistently posts smart stuff is silly just because it goes against an agenda
well, that is the silliness.
If you disagree... show some stuff where Goff does better than Stafford.
I think there is a couple of things I could show that Goff does better ... I don't pick favorites among them, I don't have an agenda
other than I agree with McVay and that the trade needed to be made that Stafford does things Goff could never do.
However, that does not mean Goff does not have a couple of traits that are better than Stafford.
What is silly is getting locked into some extreme position and reject facts. That's my opinion. Accuracy and fairness
should rule the day.
My guess is most here never watch guys like Benjamin or Cody Alexander or Brandon Thorn ... and don't read Jourdan
and other smart writers. That's their choice.
But even if you disagree, this guy is anything but silly. He's much smarter in terms of football than anyone here.
Why? Because he does the work and does not just run his mouth.