September 25, 2018 01:42AM
I always find those battle analysis a bit bewildering. I've never really gotten deeply into WWII... but I have studied the American Civil War and studied it in depth. And even those battles, which would seem to be much easier to understand considering little tech, machines of war, are difficult for me to comprehend as far as 'strategy'.

The sheer volume of details that needed to be considered... supply lines, scouting, geography, and on and on and on almost seem to me to require supernatural mental prowess. And then there is Grant, of course, who mainly focused on one thing and one thing only.... attack. - JamesJM
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  You guys know my love for "Midway" history. Attachments

Ramgator213September 21, 2018 04:24PM

  Which one are you?

sstrams106September 21, 2018 05:31PM

  beat me to it, Steve

21Dog160September 22, 2018 04:37AM

  Great minds...

sstrams205September 22, 2018 06:49AM

  As tall as he is. . .

RAMbeau178September 22, 2018 01:17PM

  Its just nice to see..

sstrams103September 22, 2018 01:30PM

  OK! So I look a month or two younger than Keith Richards!! LOL nm

Ramgator121September 24, 2018 04:03AM

  Speaking of Midway history

waterfield107September 24, 2018 09:35PM

  Uneducated in military strategy...

JamesJM109September 25, 2018 01:42AM

  Midway had it all.

Ramgator176September 25, 2018 06:44AM

  As a BAD strategist... as I mentioned... this strikes me as odd...

JamesJM103September 25, 2018 08:31AM

  Yeah, but what saved the US..

sstrams96September 25, 2018 08:34AM

  Midway is, IMO. the biggest "What if??" of WWII

Ramgator98September 25, 2018 06:50AM

  very interesting

ferragamo79100September 25, 2018 07:51AM

  I have read that the two most studied battles...

JamesJM98September 25, 2018 08:40AM