We saw Mcvay call out goff several times this season. We saw them bench him to play Wolford in a playoff game. Wet saw them decline to commit to him as their starter. We saw the reports that woldford was gonna get a chance to compete with goff in camp if goff wasn't traded. We saw Ramsey openly suggesting that the Rams would trade for watson while goff was still on the roster. And now we're seeing Michael brockers say that Stafford is clearly a level above goff. What other evidence do you need to suggest that the Rams didn't think he was good enough?
And you might not be making things up to justify the trade but you're certainly making things up to try and justify goff as a super bowl caliber quarterback. People are certainly suggesting that goff wasn't good enough to take the Rams where they need to go. You keep objecting to that as if it's some blasphemous idea. you'll even change a narrative just so you can argue against it. All I suggested was that was that maybe the defense was frustrated with Jared Goff's performances and you tried to claim that I said that he was a bad quarterback.
And I based my opinion about the defense solely on the fact that Jalen Ramsey was advocating for the Rams to trade for a different quarterback instead of showing support to golf and now Brockers is saying that Stafford makes them a super bowl contender. No one is making anything up there
Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 03/06/2021 10:06AM by Ram_Ruler.