January 15, 2021 10:46AM | Registered: 14 years ago Posts: 8,503 Status: HOF Inductee |
Quote
max
Couple of things here.
1. I like Jake, he’s a great kid. And that’s the point, he’s a 22 year old kid. I give him a ton of credit for all the effort he puts in, but he’s far from a competent analyst. He’s memorized a ton of names and numbers but he’s not Matt Waldman. On top of that, Jake has a soft spot for talent limited players. He’s still beating the drum for Austin Davis, who he thought was gonna be the next Brett Favre.
2. Wolford is an overachiever, but the reality is he plays recklessly. He’s undersized and leads with his head, an injury just waiting to happen. He puts it all out there on the field, and it’s a double edged sword, what gives him a shot to play in the NFL with his limited physical ability also puts him in harms way. He is in no way a long term answer.
3. Goff may not be the long term answer either, my head tells me he’s not. I think he gets one more year to step up his game to be something like an Eli Manning level QB. But for now, we gotta live with him as our best option. Don’t have to like it, but that’s the lay of the land.
Subject | Author | Views | Posted |
---|---|---|---|
Rams film breakdown: Goff v Wolford | Speed_Kills | 598 | January 15, 2021 07:01AM |
Calm down a bit | max | 226 | January 15, 2021 07:59AM |
Re: whose excited | Speed_Kills | 211 | January 15, 2021 08:37AM |
Re: whose excited | max | 157 | January 15, 2021 09:08AM |
One thing you will rarely see from me... | JamesJM | 123 | January 15, 2021 09:19AM |
Re: whose excited | moklerman | 111 | January 15, 2021 09:28AM |
only disagreement I have | Speed_Kills | 140 | January 15, 2021 10:20AM |
Then you haven’t seen enough | max | 122 | January 15, 2021 01:08PM |
Re: Then you haven’t seen enough | Speed_Kills | 268 | January 15, 2021 02:47PM |
The analysis is not there I agree | merlin | 165 | January 15, 2021 10:46AM |
Re: The analysis is not there I agree | max | 174 | January 15, 2021 10:51AM |
Re: The analysis is not there I agree | merlin | 143 | January 15, 2021 10:57AM |
Re: The analysis is not there I agree | zn | 144 | January 15, 2021 11:11AM |
Re: The analysis is not there I agree | max | 124 | January 15, 2021 11:45AM |