Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Calm down a bit

January 15, 2021 07:59AM
Couple of things here.

1. I like Jake, he’s a great kid. And that’s the point, he’s a 22 year old kid. I give him a ton of credit for all the effort he puts in, but he’s far from a competent analyst. He’s memorized a ton of names and numbers but he’s not Matt Waldman. On top of that, Jake has a soft spot for talent limited players. He’s still beating the drum for Austin Davis, who he thought was gonna be the next Brett Favre.

2. Wolford is an overachiever, but the reality is he plays recklessly. He’s undersized and leads with his head, an injury just waiting to happen. He puts it all out there on the field, and it’s a double edged sword, what gives him a shot to play in the NFL with his limited physical ability also puts him in harms way. He is in no way a long term answer.

3. Goff may not be the long term answer either, my head tells me he’s not. I think he gets one more year to step up his game to be something like an Eli Manning level QB. But for now, we gotta live with him as our best option. Don’t have to like it, but that’s the lay of the land.



~ max ~
“The consciousness of good intentions disdains ambiguity.” - Alexander Hamilton



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/15/2021 07:59AM by max.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Rams film breakdown: Goff v Wolford

Speed_Kills599January 15, 2021 07:01AM

  Calm down a bit

max226January 15, 2021 07:59AM

  Re: whose excited

Speed_Kills212January 15, 2021 08:37AM

  Re: whose excited

max158January 15, 2021 09:08AM

  One thing you will rarely see from me...

JamesJM124January 15, 2021 09:19AM

  Re: whose excited

moklerman112January 15, 2021 09:28AM

  only disagreement I have

Speed_Kills143January 15, 2021 10:20AM

  Then you haven’t seen enough

max123January 15, 2021 01:08PM

  Re: Then you haven’t seen enough

Speed_Kills268January 15, 2021 02:47PM

  The analysis is not there I agree

merlin166January 15, 2021 10:46AM

  Re: The analysis is not there I agree

max175January 15, 2021 10:51AM

  Re: The analysis is not there I agree

merlin144January 15, 2021 10:57AM

  Re: The analysis is not there I agree

zn145January 15, 2021 11:11AM

  Re: The analysis is not there I agree

max124January 15, 2021 11:45AM