However, my analysis is based on data. The frustrating things about discussing this with you is you ignore it. You don’t even comment on it

You don’t even say “hey speed I see what you are saying”. You just say I disagree

What are disagreeing with? In his last 9 games with Cooks either concussed, reduced role, or gone his production is way down. Those are facts.

You can’t even say Speed you’re right. We do need to see him get more involved.

So really for me ... you and I don’t have good exchanges because you aren’t receptive to to ideas and data to back up those ideas even when that data clearly shows a pattern.

It’s sort of like when you say the Rams will be better than the previous year (every year) without any evidence to support it

All good .... and I guess I appreciate you chiming in but I’m looking for a thoughtful response to my question. thx man

Quote
Rams43

Quote
Speed_Kills
the Rams just paid a WR 16 million a year that is averaging 4 catches for 40 yards a game in his last 9

That's not the kind of production we've come to expect from Kupp or a receiver making that kind of money for that matter

Not sure how you are not picking up on that and the difference it makes is it might suggest that Kupp's production out of the slot was dependant Cooks vertical threat that commanded a safety over the top.

Without Cooks defenses can more easily account for Kupp

That's what difference it makes

We simply disagree on Kupp’s value to this team, Speed.

If the Rams feel that they can afford him, then I’m more than happy that he was extended. Good teams don’t let such players get away.

Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/19/2020 05:28AM by Speed_Kills.